The Adventures of a Middle Kid
  • Blog
  • About Me
  • Contact
  • Extra! Extra!
    • The War Between the States--A Journal
    • Book List
  • The Bee Project

The Day that Started at Mid-night

3/8/2015

1 Comment

 
Yes, I know. Technically, every day starts at mid-night. However, most sane persons are tucked safely in bed, fast asleep at that hour. 

Last night, I went to bed at a reasonable hour, say ten "old time", eleven by the already set-ahead clocks. (I detest "Daylight Savings Time", you know.) I was nearly asleep (or perhaps had been dozing) when my phone started ringing. I honestly probably wouldn't have heard it except that I heard Savannah stumbling down the stairs. I assumed it was Grandma and I knew I should get out of bed immediately, but I thought I would lay there until Savannah called me (I wasn't in very good shape). However, after what may have been five or more minutes and still not being called, I figured that I really had better get out of my comfortable bed and go see what was up. 

It was actually Mama. Grandma had called her, rather upset. I think that Daddy was on the phone with Grandma simultaneously to Mama being on the phone with us...but I'm not really completely sure about that. What I do know is that Grandpa had had another "crime scene" and I was asked to go out. I was practically in tears, feeling crazy stressed and completely overwhelmed, but I forced the salt-water back and poked out my stubborn chin and tromped out--after tucking my nightgown down into my coveralls. 

I helped get Grandpa cleaned up and cleaned up the floor...

We managed to get some protein shake/chocolate milk into him--actually Savannah did. I fixed it up, but while she talked Grandpa through the drinking of said concoction I sat cross-legged on the floor talking with Mum.

When we came in, it was 1:00 o'clock "real time" and I was hungry. Anyway, Savannah and I had us a real mid-night snack of fried eggs. I can fry an egg half-asleep to perfection it seems. :P Bragging on myself...sorry. Actually, I managed to bust both my yolks, but Savannah's were perfect.

I woke up about 8:30 (7:30 if it were yesterday) and by the time I had gotten my coffee, both Savannah and I decided to play going to church by ear. As it turns out, it was providential that we did not manage it. We went out to the apartment about 10-ish, I guess it was, and it was soon apparent that Grandpa needed to go to the doctor. He was still refusing food and while we did get a chocolate milk and a plain ol' warm milk down him, food was NOT going into him and, as Grandma had noted, he was not urinating. 

In order to get the wheelchair van out of the barn required breaking the hold the ice still had on the bottom of the door. After taking the edger tool to it and breaking it up some on the outside of the door and yanking and pulling and panting (both inside and out), I 'chanced' to remark something about a crowbar. Savannah saw one and picked it up and started banging. I saw a serious pry bar (tall as me). Grabbing it I said, "Git out of the way." (I was still a little groggy so it probably sounded harsher than I meant it to.)

Savannah backed off and I gave the wood along the bottom of the door a couple of serious smashing blows and the door was free. 

To cut a long story shorter, we eventually got Grandpa loaded and to the hospital.

They put a catheter in him (I cringe at the thought!) and it was quite obvious that he has  a UTI. He was also dehydrated and the ER doctor (who reminded me a little of my cousin's husband) said that his kidneys were in the process of failing--which Grandma already had said. They put him on a saline IV immediately as well as an antibiotic via the drip-line.

Grandpa was half-out of his head most of the day. He apparently woke up on the battlefield and was initially (as he thought) in a field hospital. Even though he knew who we were, he asked if we were field nurses. That was what was so strange about his hallucination--he was perfectly clear and was aware of what was really going on around him, but he was equally certain of his dreams. Grandma has still not learned to "play along" with hallucinations...and Savannah does it better than I do. At any rate, he was crying on and off throughout the day. Partly due, I know, to his memories of Harold, his uncle who was but five years his senior and his best friend. Harold was killed during the war. (WWII)  

Anyway, Savannah had forgotten to bring the food with us that she had prepared before we left, so I was getting really hungry...however, and I thank God for this especial providential blessing upon myself today, I simply "got hungry" and did not have the requisite irritation both emotional and physical (burning stomach, et al) that so frequently accompanies my hunger. She went home at some point to bring both Grandma and myself something to eat and to pick up a few other things that were necessary. She got back around 5:30. 

That was the best egg sandwich ever. 

Shortly after my appetite was sated, Grandpa's supper arrived. While he did not eat it all, he ate over half of it (I think) and enjoyed every bite (particularly that hash brown, I think). He drank the milk that came with it and the coffee (another providential blessing--they had put one sugar packet on his tray and it was not sufficient to sweeten his coffee to taste; however, the dinner tray cart had been left just outside his door...and I was able to snitch the last two sugar packets off it!). This is the best he has eaten and drank probably for at least two days, so it was good to see him eating and apparently enjoying it. He had half a piece of cake too. (All that sugar...I'd be tipsy if I had that much!)

We left to come home shortly after that...I had to feed chickens and I like to do that before it gets dark. I took care of a few other little things that needed doing before I went to the shower...and I think we are fixing to eat again. :) For which I am glad because I'm getting hungry again. I have sort of caught up with my fluid intake--since getting home, I have had over a quart and a half of water.

Overall, I think Grandpa is doing much better this evening than he was this morning. Grandma has stayed with him at the hospital, for the expressed purpose of being able to see the doctor when he comes in (as it may be early). Hopefully, the fluid getting into Grandpa will, for lack of a better, more scientific term/understanding of the situation, re-kick-start his kidney's into full and proper functioning. 

I shall sleep soundly tonight, Lord willing, knowing that Grandpa is not in my hands...but in both those of persons who really know what they are dealing with...and ultimately in the hands of my Heavenly Father.

     Racheal

1 Comment

So...Led's See if I can write...

3/7/2015

0 Comments

 
Note to the grammar-freaks out there...that mis-matched, mis-spelled title is purposeful. It's me at the moment...or really most of the day.

I have been borderline, crossed the border, back over to borderline on and off all day meningitis-y. I finally figured out (maybe again) how to describe it to an "outsider". I look kinda high...or drunk...

I feel kinda high...or drunk. 

I can't stand up straight. I can't sit up straight. I have difficulty holding my eyes open past half-shut.

I slur when I speak. 

I was singing while washing my hair this evening...and that was when it hit me...that I sounded drunk. I do. 

I have difficulty focusing my eyes.

I hear slow. Or maybe I should say that it takes extra time to process what I am hearing. 

I move slower than usual.

At dinner, in order to keep my face out of my soup, I had to prop myself up on my elbows. 

I would probably go into a giggling fit if something funny enough passed before me. One of those that leave me helpless and red in the face, unable to breathe. (Called "giggle gas" amongst our family.)

My thoughts are muddled. If I'm thinking at all. I can just sit here and be as blank as a clean slate if I don't force myself to be somewhat more alert. Not kidding. That's some serious "dead-brain".

Now...take that and imagine me trying to be of assistance to my grandparents. That's one of those "force yourself to be slightly mentally active" times. 

Grandpa apparently got up at 5 or thereabouts this morning. (He put himself to bed last night, for which I am grateful.) Grandma didn't get up until after noon. In the meantime, Grandpa had not eaten anything. He was complaining of his neck hurting and feeling to weak to hold up his head. He was literately holding it up with is hands. He was really pale and had terrible low blood pressure. Then I found out he hadn't had anything to eat since supper last night.

Grandma fixed him some eggs and I sat there for nigh on two hours...essentially force feeding him. He said he had "had enough" after half a dozen bites, but I kept demanding him to open his mouth and he did eventually get it all down. All the eggs...and a little over half the bread. I got him to eat all the eggs by telling him I wasn't going to make him eat all the bread (but I was slipping some onto the spoon with the eggs each bite). He did have a big cup of cocoa and half a mug of orange juice. By the time that force feed was over, his color had been restored to normal and I think he was feeling a little stronger.

It's a hard thing to sit there and demand of your 92 year old grandfather, a man who has always eaten, to "Open your mouth. Grandpa. Open your mouth." 

By the time I got him fed (Savannah was in and out and helping hold up his head and rubbing the knot in his neck), I was so hungry myself that I had to come in and get something to eat before I could take my next set of killers.

We went back out later and he was in his recliner...but was needing to get up and go to the bathroom. Well...to shorten the story, we had what is known as a "crime scene" amongst elder-care persons...Grandma primarily took care of that, but I assisted in what ways I could without getting in the way. Grandpa decided to stay in bed at that stage of the game and there is where I left him. I hope he sat up to eat...Grandma was making shrimp. Between "breakfast/lunch" he had an ice cream bar. He is NOT getting enough to eat...and he doesn't want to eat. It's not even like Grandma isn't feeding him either...

I think protein shake is called for. However, I'm about wrote out...so I'm going to weave myself off to the big recliner in the living room. 

Now...how sane was all of that? *blinks trying to focus eyes* Nevermind...

      Racheal

0 Comments

Intentions and Outcome

3/6/2015

0 Comments

 
Intentions do not necessarily get you anywhere. 

My intention today was to take care of a few "smallish" areas of Cow Cavalry editing. Weellll...that didn't get very far. First off because of one or two things I need off my laptop and both my USB sticks are plugged in and in use while editing...I would have had to close all the programs in use. I decided that I would just pick that stuff up 'next time'...

And then I went in search of a hunk of footage I thought I had...while declaring, "I need Yankees. I need Yankees on horses!"

Savannah, who was making lunch, burst into laughter..."You need a Yankee?" (No offense, my friends of Northern persuasion...)

I did find the "missing" footage...only to find out that the "yankee" horsemen I thought I had were non-existent. I had some good shots of Confederate cavalry...but only a grand total of two blue coats a-horse. Phooey.

Anyway, I didn't get very far. After lunch, I didn't touch it. I had started out the day feeling good, but by that time I was feeling sleepy (only sleepy isn't quite an accurate description) and couldn't focus at all.

Then Grandma called while I was helping get lunch on the table (boy, those smoked herrings were salty!!) and asked if I'd come help get Grandpa out of bed. I ate lunch first because I would have been a grouch had I not. Yes, this is two days in a row that Grandpa has not gotten up until someplace around 1:30 to 2:00. I seriously think that he really could get himself up (and to bed; I helped him last night...hopefully, he will manage going to bed without help tonight)...but he has this pain that he isn't pushing through and complaining about. I had a little talk with him after getting him up today, though I don't know how much it sunk in...but I basically told him that he needs to work at it a little harder so he doesn't get weak(er)--partly for my sake. He's over six foot tall and weighs over 200 lb.s. I'm at best 5' 2.5" and not as strong as I once was (though I have toned up a little with the wood-work recently). I simply cannot pick him up. I can give a little assistance, but I cannot pick him up. (And I wouldn't like him to fall on me either...) He argued with me just a little, but maybe it sunk in. I hope so, because while I do not mind being of assistance, I do not want to become a crutch for him. He is capable of transferring himself and dressing himself...and I think he should do so. Pain or no pain. I would bet (were I a gambler) that Grandma is actually in more pain that he is....

When I came in, I drank my coffee and washed the dishes. Then I made bread and washed eggs...and fried up the cracked ones for the chickens and cats. Then I had a snack and read for awhile before going to feed the chickens. I put some new straw down and fetched another sack of feed out of the barn. I find it interesting how "softer" bags, though the same weight as, say, pellet-filled bags, seem heavier...I always have noticed that. The mineral I gave the cows always felt heavier than the pellets--though both bags weighed 50 lb.s. Just an interesting phenomena.

After that I hauled out some "slops" and the ashes. I would have moved wood around in the basement, but Savannah was doing it, so I let her. :)

Then...we ate supper! Yes, of course I was hungry again...

And there you have it...my intentions didn't get very far...but I actually got some necessary stuff done. :)

     Racheal

0 Comments

Yeah...That's Right!

3/3/2015

1 Comment

 
In other words, when dealing with a hypochondriac, if they suggest something less fatal than dying...or going to the doctor with over a foot of snow surrounding the house and a layer of ice over everything...such as that old rib break aching, jump on the bandwagon! :)

Of course, having had broken bones myself that yes, do on occasion cause me a twinge...it's an easy enough bandwagon to mount. That, and I know the argument has worked before when Grandpa is having a "I have this pain in my back" moment. 

Grandma called Savannah this morning to tell her that Grandpa was complaining. A little while later she called again and I answered the phone. I told her I'd come out and see if I could talk to him. He's back on his cancer meds after a hiatus and it causes him to become confused and also to fixate on things. 

Well, I went out there and Grandpa was sitting on the edge of the bed, half-dressed. He clearly wasn't in quite as much pain as he was making out (I can read his pain pretty well, after all, I know how to make him cry from the ol' therapy days and we didn't get there), even though he made some remark about "I'm dying" (mayhap a little too chipperly).

Savannah had called Mama...who called Grandma...who put Grandpa on the phone...and then it was my turn. :) Phone tag of sorts. 

Anyway, I put some muscle rub on Grandpa and stretched his back out by putting my right hand over the "spot" and putting my left arm across his shoulders in the front and simultaneously pushing forward with the right and backward with the left arm (probably got closest to tears then; but I couldn't really see his face being behind him, but he wasn't sucking his breath in bad enough for that either). I know he gets tight simply from sitting slouched over with his chin on his chest. 

Then I proceeded to convince him to let me help him finish dressing and to come out and eat his breakfast. (By this point it was actually after noon.) I managed to rip the back of his depends...badly, in fact...but he said it'd be fine and so we went ahead and got him into his pants. I helped him transfer from the bed to the wheelchair (though he did do most of it himself...I try not to help too much.)

Then, while he busied himself in making his way to the kitchen, I cleaned up the bathroom and turned out the lights back there. I brushed his hair (he always grimaces when I do that...I cannot be sure if I hurt him or not or if he's just closing his eyes in case I accidentally stick the hair-brush in his eyes?) and moved his shoes out from under the table.

Then, I came in for my lunch.

I confess that as I readied myself to go out, that I felt rather irritated; "Why does Grandpa have to be a hypochondriac? Never be a hypochondriac!!"

But then...I remembered...he's "only" 92 years old...and I may not have him for very much longer. That changed my attitude pretty quick...Yes, even I have to be reminded of my own mantra about the privilege and honor it is to serve our elderly. It doesn't mean that it's always easy, and dealing with hypochondria can be rather taxing at times, but I should never let my own selfish interests come between me and doing what I can to bring ease and comfort into the lives of my aging grandparents. NEVER.

I'll pop back out later to take them some more eggs and check on everything....

     Racheal

1 Comment

The Times They Are A-Changin'

3/2/2015

0 Comments

 
Well...maybe not that much; but I do have an announcement to make! (No, I'm not engaged...nor in a courtship...or anything like that at all, y'all! ;D)

No, this has to do with something maybe not as exciting as the above might be. It really has to do more with a slightly updated, altered "vision". A vision for my filmmaking. (I suppose I really ought to call it "video-making" but that sounds cheesy, though it is technically more accurate.)

Yes, Sparks of Reformation Productions is...well...history.

I'd like to introduce you to my new name: Freedom's Light Films

I believe that suits my vision better and it goes more along the lines of documentaries covering previous generations than Sparks of Reformation did. Pop over and drop me a note as to what you think of the new site. It will, of course, get more "stuff" on it as time goes by, but for now, it's brand new. :)

Directly after lunch, I intend on clamping my headphones back on my head and driving on with the Cow Cavalry edit.

That is, if I'm not engaged in the construction of a commissioned doll dress!!

     Racheal

0 Comments

Chapter 17: Justification by Faith in Christ Alone, Part 1

3/1/2015

0 Comments

 
A new chapter...the last in Volume 2! I did not finish it today, but I plowed through ninety-odd pages.

Anyway, Chapter 17 covers questions #69-73...
“Justification… is the soul of Christianity and the fountainhead of all true comfort and sanctification. He who errs in this doctrine errs to his eternal destruction.”1...HOW CAN A SINFUL HUMAN BEING BE ACCEPTED BY THE HOLY, SIN‑HATING GOD? 1. Wilhelmus á Brakel, The Christian’s Reasonable Service, 4 vols., trans. Bartel Elshout (Ligonier, PA: Soli Deo Gloria Publications, 1993), 2:341. (721)

Self-justification damns the person guilty of it because it is based on that person’s faith in himself. Justification by God through faith in Christ saves forever because it is based on the life and redemptive work of Jesus Christ. (722)
Question 69: What is the communion in grace which the members of the invisible church have with Christ? A.: The communion in grace which the members of the invisible church have with Christ, is their partaking of the virtue of his mediation, in their justification, adoption, sanctification, and whatever else, in this life, manifests their union with him.

The believer's communion in grace with Christ:

The Biblical text the Catechism gives to support its statement is 1 Corinthians 1:30: “But by His doing you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption.” The point of this verse is this: because God has, brought us into union and communion with Christ, i.e., has
placed us “in Christ,” in that relationship God has made Christ to be to us “wisdom, and righteousness, sanctification and redemption.”  (723)

We enjoy personal fellowship with Him as a living person; and because of that union with Him, we participate in all the accomplishment of His work as Mediator of the New Covenant. Because of our union and communion with the person of Christ, we participate in all those benefits which He purchased for us in His death. (723)

To say that Christ purchased the blessings of salvation for us, is not to say that He purchased God’s love for us...It was God’s eternal love for His people that moved Him to send His only begotten Son to redeem them (John 3:16; Rom. 5:8). (724)
The definition of "justification":
Our sins have separated us from God, alienating us as sinners from God. To receive the gifts of God and the inheritance of God’s children, we must be restored to acceptance with God. To be accepted with God, we must have the cause of the hostility between us removed, that is, our sins must be forgiven; and we must be given that by which we are accepted with God which is the righteousness of
Christ. By His death on the cross, Jesus Christ removed the obstacle of sin: “He who knew no sin was made sin for us” (2 Cor. 5:21); and He is made “to us righteousness” (1 Cor. 1:30)....Our sins have been credited (imputed) to Him and His righteousness
has been credited (imputed) to us. By His obedience in life and death, we, who are represented by Him, are “made righteous” (Rom. 5:19). (724-725)
We are justified by God Alone, the Judge of heaven and earth:
The Bible is emphatic: God is “just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus” (Rom. 3:26)....“[A]nd whom He [God] predestined, He also called; and these whom He called HE also justified” (Rom. 8:30). Justification—the declaring of a believer to be righteous because of Christ—is an act of God, and of God alone. It is not self-justification, or peer-justification, or psychiatrist-justification, it is JUSTIFICATION BY GOD, whose decisions are just, infallible, irreversible, legal, unalterable and eternal. (725-726)

The point of these questions is that condemnation by God is an utter impossibility for all whom GOD HAS JUSTIFIED. It is legally and morally absurd to think that God would ever condemn those whom He has declared righteous and accepted in Christ. (726)

“Justification” and “justify” are legal, judicial, forensic terms, the language of the courtroom. (726)

“The sentence of a human judge is merely declarative; it does not constitute a man either innocent or guilty, it only pronounces him to be so in the eye of the law...whereas in justifying the sinner, God does what no human judge can do,—He first constitutes him righteous, who was not righteous before, and then declares him to be righteous in His infallible judgment, which is ever according to truth”
[James Buchanan, The Doctrine of Justification]. (727)

"Not only does God declare the sinner justified, he also constitutes him just. The declaration presupposes the imputation of righteousness....It is entirely in the forensic area that the constitutive act occurs."12. Morton Smith, Systematic Theology, 2 vols. (Greenville, SC: Greenville Seminary Press, 1994), 2:457–58. (727)
Definition of "to justify":
The word, “justify,” in Greek and Hebrew, does NOT mean “to make righteous,” as Roman Catholicism teaches; but “to declare righteous.”...To justify means to declare a person’s life in harmony with and in conformity to the Law of God. (728)

If there is a dispute between men and they go to court, and the judges decide their case, and they justify the righteous and condemn the wicked, then it shall be if the wicked man deserves to be beaten, the judge shall then make him lie down and be beaten in his presence (Deut. 25:1–2).

The issue here is not in making someone righteous or wicked, both of which are beyond the ability of a judge....Evidence is presented, one person is proven to be not guilty, and the judge “justifies the righteous,” i.e., declares him not guilty of breaking the law but in conformity to that law. The other person is proven guilty, and the judge “condemns the wicked,” i.e., he declares him guilty, having broken the law, and liable to just punishment for his crime. (729)

The purity and essence of the gospel is at stake in our definition of the word “justify.” (730)

The Catechism introduces the doctrine of Justification with the words that it is an act of God, rather than a work of God, or a process of God. It is an ACT, completed all at once and of eternal value and effect. It is not a progressive work that continues through life. (730)

Although justification is a legal and judicial declaration by God, it is not to be abstracted from the life of believers as if it were irrelevant to our everyday experience. ...

"[W]hen we speak of justification, we must recognize that this legal act by the sovereign God has moral and personal consequences for man. Where there is no justification, there is condemnation. When the living God who made every atom of man’s being declares a man to be legally justified, then every atom of that man’s being is alive with this freedom from sin and death and the penalties thereof. Then
man’s conscience and being reflect, not condemnation but justification. Then too the calling of and the responsibilities under God previously denied are now assumed and discharged in terms of a growing sanctification." 16. Rousas J. Rushdoony, Systematic Theology, 2 vols. (Vallecito, CA: Ross House Books, 1994), 1:624–25. (731)
Justification by grace alone:
Justification is an act of GOD’S FREE GRACE: “being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus” (Rom. 3:24). 
" This combination of the terms “freely” and “by His grace” emphasize the completely unmerited and unearned character of God’s justification. “Freely” is literally “without a cause,” meaning that no cause, merit or worth in man is the
basis of his acceptance with God; rather his justification with God is based on “His grace,” i.e., His totally unmerited, undeserved, unearned favor on those who have merited His condemnation." 17. John Murray, New International Commentary on the New Testament:The Epistle to the Romans, 2 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1959), 1:115.(731-732)

Justification is an act of God’s grace, as distinguished from His creative and providential works.
"A grace is something given; a work is something done. Justification is a grace, a something bestowed by the kindness and love of God, and not a something which is procured by works, either small or great....To the Redeemer it is just and right; to the sinner it is kindness and generosity." 18 Webb, Christian Salvation: Its Doctrine and Experience, 359–60. (732)

The grace of justification is seen also in the identity of those who are chosen of God, whom God justifies by faith—the ungodly, who are chosen of God and who believe in Christ. (732)

First, God “justifies the ungodly” (Rom. 4:5), because “Christ died for the ungodly” (Rom. 5:6). The Catechism reflects this Biblical emphasis when it defines justification as an act of God’s free grace UNTO SINNERS. (733)

"“Him that justifieth the ungodly.” These words cannot mean less than that God, in the act of justification, has no regard whatever to any thing good resting to the credit of the person He justifies. They declare, emphatically, that immediately
prior to the divine act, God beholds the subject only as unrighteous, ungodly, wicked, so that no good, either in or by the person justified, can possibly be the ground on which or the reason for which He justifies him."20 Pink, The Doctrines of Election and Justification, 228 (733)

Second, God justifies His “elect” (Rom. 8:33). From all eternity God willed the justification of those upon whom He set His love and predestinated to eternal life: “Whom He foreknew [foreloved], He also predestined… and these whom He predestined, He also called; and these whom He called, He also justified” (Rom. 8:29– 30). (733-734)

Third, God justifies “the one who believes in Jesus” (Rom. 3:26), “apart from the works of the Law” (Rom. 3:28). God justifies those who rest upon Christ alone for salvation, who receive Him as their Lord and Savior, and who in no way trust in themselves or in anything or anyone else for their acceptance with God. Salvation is
“through faith” and not through our efforts or merit, because salvation is “by grace” alone. (734)
The two elements of justification:
William C. Robinson of Columbia Seminary used to say that when Christ comes to the believer in justification, He comes with blessings in both hands: forgiveness of sins in one hand and righteousness and a title to eternal life in the other hand. The point he was making is that justification in the Bible includes two elements, two blessings. (734)

...the two elements of justification are the forgiveness of sins, which includes the
removal of all guilt and of every penalty our sins deserve, and adoption in the family of God, which includes the title to eternal life, i.e., forgiveness and righteous standing with God. (735)

It is of utmost importance that we understand that justification is more than forgiveness of sins. Forgiveness removes that which condemns us, so that we are no longer condemned; but the need remains of that which is necessary to obtain a right standing in God’s presence: a perfect righteousness which we cannot produce,
but which God in grace must credit to us. (735)

The FIRST ELEMENT in justification is THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS: “Blessed are those whose lawless deeds have been forgiven, and whose sins have been covered. Blessed is the man whose sin the Lord will not take into account” (Rom. 4:7–8). (736)

These two verses are important in understanding justification for several reasons. (1) They show us that the New Testament doctrine of justification by faith is imbedded in the Old Testament. (2) They illustrate and confirm Paul’s theme that justification is by faith and not by works. (736)

The sinner is condemned by the divine law he has broken, making him guilty before God and liable to eternal punishment. He therefore owes the justice of God a debt of punishment. And being a creature under the Law of God, he also owes God a debt of obedience. When God forgives the justified sinner, because of the atonement of Christ, the sinner’s guilt is removed, and in the eye of God’s law, it is as if he had never sinned. (737)

This forgiveness of sin—the removal of the guilt and punishment that comes to us in justification—is complete and comprehensive. (738)

The SECOND ELEMENT in justification is GOD’S ACCEPTING AND ACCOUNTING OF THE BELIEVER AS RIGHTEOUS IN HIS SIGHT, GIVING HIM ADOPTION INTO HIS FAMILY AND A TITLE TO ETERNAL LIFE....justifying faith in Christ receives from God forgiveness of sins AND inheritance among the sanctified people of God. (740)

The justified believer is accepted as a child and heir of God, because God has given him white clothes (Rev. 4:4; 6:11) which have been washed white in the blood of the Lamb (Rev. 7:14). So then, to enter into the favorable presence of God, the believer must be washed and dressed, forgiven of sin and regarded by God as in  right‑standing with His righteous Law. (741)

These two elements of justification are necessary for our salvation
for two reasons. (1) The double demand of the Law of God. On 
one hand, the Law demands the punishment of death to transgressors; and, on the other hand, it demands obedience from all, with the promise of reward to obedience....(2) The effect of sin on the sinner. On the one hand, our sin has made us guilty before God and liable to punishment; and, on the other hand, it has made us enemies and aliens from God, who is the fountain of life and happiness. (741-742)

Although the two elements in justification are distinguishable, they are inseparable. (742)
The Refutation of Rome; Question 70: What is justification? A.: Justification is an act of God’s free grace unto sinners, in which he pardoneth all their sins, accepteth and accounteth their persons righteous in his sight; not for any thing wrought in them, or
done by them, but only for the perfect obedience and full satisfaction of Christ, by God imputed to them, and received by faith alone.
The Larger Catechism refutes the Roman Catholic doctrine of justification by saying that God pardons all the believer’s sins and accepts him as righteous in His sight, not for anything wrought in them, or done by them, and the Confession adds, but for Christ’s sake alone (XI, i).
Roman Catholicism teaches that the formal cause of justification is infused righteousness.
"The soul is made holy by the operation of the Holy Spirit through baptism. This infused righteousness banishes the nature of sin, and enables the sinner to perform good works. This infusion of righteousness [making righteous] is what Rome defines as justification, not a forensic act of declaring us accepted as righteous.… In virtue of the infused grace, a person is able to do good works, and to merit an increase of grace [initially imparted to the sinner by baptism] and attainment
of eternal life for those who persevere therein....Second, justification is not complete until the person is wholly sanctified [fully made righteous]. Not until
full satisfaction is made by temporal punishment, either in this life or in purgatory, for all post‑baptismal sins is a person fully justified."35. Smith, Systematic Theology, 2:462. (744-745)

The following is Morton Smith’s concise criticism of the position of Rome:
1. Rome rejects the Biblical idea of justification as a forensic act. ...
2. The Biblical ground of justification is ignored. Roman Catholicism emphatically rejects the doctrine that the righteousness of Christ is the righteousness imputed in justification. ...
3. Rome relegates faith to a position of relative unimportance. This is certainly contrary to the Biblical emphasis on faith, especially in connection with justification.
4. Rome substitutes baptism for faith as the instrumental cause of salvation.
5. The rejection of the Biblical teaching that justification is a once for all act of God, and the substitution of a progressive justification is another error of Rome.
6. Rome’s teaching on merit cuts across the Biblical teaching that by the works of the law no flesh shall be justified. According to Rome good works increase grace and procure eternal life.
7. Rome teaches that justification may be lost by infidelity or by mortal sin.36. Smith, Systematic Theology, 2:462–63. (745-746)
The refutation of Legalism:
The Catechism refutes legalism by saying that God pardons all the believer’s sins and accepts him in His favor… not for anything…done by them. Legalism, at heart, is the teaching that a person is accepted with God on the basis of his meriting the favor of God by obeying the laws of God. (746)

In the tribunal of God, the standard of judgment is the perfect character of God revealed in His Law. (746)

The reason every mouth should be closed and the whole world condemned before God is “because by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified in His sight.”...Furthermore, justification by the works of the law is impossible, for
the function of God’s Law is to bring the knowledge of sin and to convict of sin. (747)

The Bible, in its presentation of salvation, shuts the door once and for all to any self‑praise, self-trust, self-righteousness, self-congratulation, i.e., “boasting,” because our sins are forgiven and we are accepted into God’s favor “by faith apart from the works of the law”....Justification by doing good works always finds its basis in that which the person is and does and merits. It is always oriented toward a person’s esteem of himself as basically virtuous. The specific nature of faith is trust in and commitment to another to provide what man cannot provide. Salvation based on meritorious works is based on faith in self; salvation by grace looks
away from self to the meritorious works of Another in man’s behalf. (748)

The only way to be justified by God is “through faith in Christ Jesus.” This is not simply intellectual conviction, it is an act of coming to Christ to be to the believer what Christ claims to be in His Word....Faith in Christ, then, “is an act of committal, not just assenting to the fact that Jesus lived and died, but running to Him for refuge and calling on Him for mercy.”44 Stott, The Message of Galatians, 62. (749)
The basis of justification; justification by Christ alone!
In the Larger Catechism’s definition of justification (Q. 70), we are told that God forgives the believer of his sins and accepts him into His favor, not because of any merit in him or performed by him, BUT ONLY FOR THE PERFECT OBEDIENCE AND FULL SATISFACTION OF CHRIST. (755)

God requires of human beings two demands if anyone is to be acquitted before God’s tribunal and received into His family. (1) the full payment of the penalty due him for his sins against God, and (2) a perfect life of obedience from the heart to God’s Law without the smallest infraction. (755)

These are demands which are totally beyond the capabilities of human beings to perform. (756)

God, the Judge of the universe, pardons believers of their sins and adopts them into His eternal family on the basis of the life and death of Jesus Christ, who has completely satisfied all the demands of God’s Law for all those whom He came to earth to save. He obeyed ALL the requirements of the Law and paid ALL the penalties of the Law in behalf of and in the place of sinners. And, it was God’s love and mercy that moved His great heart to send His Son to be our Savior—But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us (Rom. 5:8). (756)

So then, if sinners are to be justified by God, the only ground they have to stand on is, not their own righteousness, but the life and work of Jesus Christ, their Substitute. In our place and for us, He became incarnate and lived a life of perfect obedience to God’s Law; by this vicarious obedience believers are saved from
sin and reconciled to God...And, in our place and for us He suffered and died on the cross; by this vicarious punishment believers are saved from sin and reconciled to God... (757)

Jesus Christ was our substitute in life and death. He lived for us, obeying God’s Law in our place; and He died for us, taking the punishment God’s Law required because of our sins, in our place. And so, the basis of our justification is the obedience and sacrifice of Christ. (758)
The method of justification: imputation.
How can God justify someone He knows to be a guilty sinner, and remain a just God?...Christ’s righteousness is credited (imputed) to believers as the basis of their justification with God. Thus, “the Biblical gospel stands or falls with the concept of IMPUTATION. Without the imputation of our sins to Christ, there is no atonement. (759)

IMPUTATION is a Biblical idea.  ...
IMPUTATION is fundamental to the gospel of Christ, so that, without it, as we have seen, we have no gospel. “The Biblical doctrine of justification is not a legal fiction. It is a legal reality precisely because it is based on a real (or true) imputation of real and true righteousness. Neither Christ’s righteousness nor its imputation to us is a matter of fiction. It represents the reality of divine grace.”62
IMPUTATION is used with reference to three acts of God in the history of the human race.
First, Adam’s sin was IMPUTED to all his descendants, i.e., the entire human race whom he represented in the covenant of works....He acted for the race, the race was
charged with the guilt and consequences of his disobedience. ...
Sin and death entered human existence and permeated human experience at the very beginning of the human race with the disobedience of Adam in the Garden of Eden (Gen. 3)....The one sin of the one man Adam is counted (imputed) as the sin of
all human beings. ...
Second, man’s sin has been IMPUTED to Christ. ...
God made the Sinless One sin for us, for whom He died. God did not make Him a “sinner,” He made Him to be “sin” for us. This point must never be overlooked, for to make Christ Himself a sinner would be to destroy the very possibility of His being our Redeemer from sin. ...
Third, Christ’s righteousness is IMPUTED to believers....Christ’s death reconciledus to God, because the sinner’s sins are imputed to Christ and the spotless perfection of Christ’s righteous life is credited to us, with the consequence that “Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus” (Rom. 8:1). ...
This “righteousness of God” consisting of Christ’s obedience and sacrifice, which is imputed to believers, refers to merits of Christ’s righteous life and obedient death that are actually credited to the account of believers just as if we had worked those things out ourselves. 62. Sproul, Faith Alone, 106. (760-764)
The instrument of justification: faith alone (sola fide).
After teaching that justification is an act of God’s grace in which He pardons all our sins and accepts us into His favor as righteous in His sight, because of the perfect obedience and full satisfaction of Christ, the Catechism concludes (A. 70) by pointing out the instrument by which God’s righteousness and salvation become ours. It states very simply that they are RECEIVED BY FAITH ALONE. (768)

The rallying cry of the Protestant Reformation over against the sacramental system of merits of Roman Catholicism was SOLA FIDE!, which is Latin for “BY FAITH ALONE!” The word, “alone,” is essential to the gospel of salvation for without it room could be made for additional requirements....Faith is the ONLY means for receiving justification, not faith PLUS something else. It is faith in Christ as Lord and Savior that brings us justification, not anything else we may know, feel, or do. (769)

Faith in Christ is THE instrument by which justification is received, not the cause or basis of justification. The cause is the grace of God and the basis is the righteousness of Christ. Faith contributes or merits nothing toward our justification. (770)

Whereas it is God who justifies the ungodly, it is only those who believe in Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior who are justified by God; and they are not justified by Him until they believe in Jesus. (770)

The gospel tells us that we are justified by faith, through faith, of faith, but NEVER does it tell us that we are justified on the basis of faith, or on account of faith.83 We are justified on the basis of, and on account of, Christ’s righteousness and Christ’s blood, not on the basis of or on account, of our believing in Christ. (771)
By this point in my reading, I should know that what seems like it may only be a three or four page excursion will actually end up covering closer to thirty or forty pages...in other words, by the time I realized that the next series of thought processes were not just a wee side jaunt, I knew picking up my note taking again would be futile--in the sense of being lost in the middle of it all. Regardless, to sum up as quickly as I may, it was primarily about how Paul in Roman's demonstrated sola fide and a comparison of the Bible versus Rome on the topic. And it reminded me of this scene out of one of my favorite films:

     Racheal

0 Comments
Forward>>
    New post on The Bee Project! 04/26/18
    Picture

    The Middle Kid

    I chose to title this blog "The Adventures of a Middle Kid" because that is exactly what I'll be detailing (mostly). I chose 'kid' over any other word, like 'girl' (I am the middle girl so it also would have worked) or 'child'
    (since I am no longer exactly a child).

    I am a middle kid and I will always be a middle kid--even when I'm 80!

    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013

    Follow
    Picture
    The anti-Christ will not overrun Christ’s church or kingdom.
    Christ will win. He is winning. He has won. --Joe Morecraft, III
    Picture

    Categories

    All
    1942 Truck Restoration
    Accidents
    Agriculture
    Authentic Christianity
    Books
    Caretaking
    Cats
    Cattle
    Chickens
    Church
    Confederates
    Conference
    Cooking
    Costumes
    Cow Cavalry
    Family
    Farmers Market
    Filmmaking
    Food
    Friends
    History
    Holidays
    Horse
    Knitting
    Lyme/Co Infections
    Lyme/Co-Infections
    Mechanics
    Movies
    Music
    Musings
    Musket Echos
    Nonesense
    Pictures
    Politics
    Reenacting
    Rodeo
    Sewing
    Shooting
    Theology/Philosophy
    Video
    War Between The States
    Weather
    Weddings
    Work
    Writing
    WWII

    Picture

    Picture
    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Picture
    Picture
    FREEDOM'S LIGHT FILMS
    Picture
    Picture
    Reformed Reviews
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    www.fold3.com
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    7 Lb.s of Bacon Mess Band
    Picture
    Picture
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.