The Adventures of a Middle Kid
  • Blog
  • About Me
  • Contact
  • Extra! Extra!
    • The War Between the States--A Journal
    • Book List
  • The Bee Project

Of a Walnut Tree

7/30/2014

0 Comments

 
It's one of those things in life, when something you'd rather not see go, has to go.

Such was the case with our beautiful Black Walnut by the road:
Picture
It was rotting at the base and we didn't want it to fall across the road (where it most likely would have landed) and in all probability, taken out the power line across the road. (Had that happened, we would have been most unpopular with the neighbors!!)

We are all saddened to see this beautiful (and indeed heavily laden) tree felled, but as I kept saying "It's a parapet on the roof kind of situation". 
Picture
Picture
I watched it fall. It's not the first tree I've ever seen fall, but it never fails to amaze me how slowly and sedately they fall. 
Picture
The wood is beautiful...
We started the clean up...but didn't get finished. Then...we didn't work on it today for various reasons.
Picture
It got cut above the rot, but you can see here where it was starting to work upwards.
Picture
Thankfully, this one of Grandma's three "little trees" didn't get damaged too badly by the walnut's limbs crashing around it.
Guess what we found in a hollowed out portion of the tree??

FROGS... :D
Picture
Picture
There were at least three in there--maybe more. (Doesn't that one on the right look like he's smiling?)
Picture
Ze man wit de chain-saw... (you can see in this picture how close the tree is to the road.)
I was going to do a more interesting, chatty sort of post, but it just hasn't come bubbling out of me...so you'll have to put up with this one. :P

I'm feeling rather tired and I doubt my alertness last night when I should have been sleeping, but was instead thinking upon the subject of socks [don't ask--you might laugh], helped that dull tiredness I've had all day. Well, that or the very nasty ache I had in my right hip for most of the day. 

I did get a little progress made on Cow Cavalry narration...oh goodness!! Have I forgotten to share that bit of exciting news over here??? Well, last week, Mr. K sent me the narration!!!! I've worked on the Cow Cav a couple of times since then. I am still sorting through and editing audio to one extent or another at this point and haven't put my nose back to the video grindstone. (I like doing that part a lot, so please don't take that description in a negative sense!! :D)

Well, I have a handwork project I'm on a dead-line for...so I'll close for now. :)

     Racheal

0 Comments

The Mediator of the Covenant, Part 2

7/27/2014

0 Comments

 
I'll just jump right in with no preliminaries.

Today's topic (mainly, since I didn't get very far this afternoon), is the Virgin Birth and the humanity/divinity of Christ. (I do not know about you, but that latter is one of the most mind boggling doctrines in Scripture!)
Christ’s divine-human personality began at the instant of His miraculous
conception in Mary’s womb, when the angel Gabriel uttered the words to the virgin: “Hail, favored one! The Lord is with you!” (Luke 1:28). (34)

Christ became incarnate, i.e., fully human, so that, as God and man in one person, He might take sinful man’s place before God’s law and satisfy God’s justice in his behalf by bearing in Himself man’s punishment for sin. In Philippians 2:5–11, Paul says that Christ existed in the form of God and, at the same time, existed in the form of a servant, being made in the likeness of men. (34-35)
There is a short discussion of Isaiah 7:14...
The four points Isaiah stresses in 7:14 are: (1) The virgin birth is a sign; (2) The mother of the Child is one who is both unmarried and a good woman; (3) The very presence of the Child brings God to His people; (4) The name, Immanuel, cannot be applied to anyone who is not God, therefore the human child of the virgin is also God. (36)
The Spirit's part in the incarnation:
In the incarnation the Holy Spirit created the humanity of Jesus from Mary, His mother....Because of the work of the Holy Spirit Christ “was born a true man, thinking, willing, and feeling like other men, susceptible to all the human emotions and sensations that cause the countless thrills and throbs of human life.” 44 Abraham Kuyper, The Work of the Holy Spirit (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans,[1900] 1966), 83. (38)

In the incarnation the Holy Spirit preserved Jesus’ humanity from sin....From His conception throughout His life, Jesus was “holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners,” because of the work of the Holy Spirit. As the Son of God He was eternally holy and without moral blemish....Therefore it can be said, that whereas Christ was made SIN for us, He was never a SINNER. (38)
The incarnation and the Trinity:
What was the role of God the Father and God the Son in the incarnation? The Holy Spirit effected the conception of Jesus. This is not to say that He is the Father of Jesus, or that the other Persons of the Trinity had no part in the incarnation. Just as in the creation of the universe, so in the incarnation all Three Persons of the Trinity
were active. Furthermore, it is Biblical to say that the Two Persons of the Trinity, the Father and the Son, worked through the Third Person of the Trinity, the Holy Spirit. (39)

"...The relation of the Holy Spirit to the human nature of Christ is that of Creator and creature. It is the first Person of the Trinity, not the third, who is Christ’s Father [Eph. 1:3].”47 The Holy Spirit is the executive of the Godhead, the agent of the will of God, carrying out the will of the Father and the Son. 47. Edwin Palmer, The Holy Spirit (Philadelphia, PA: Presbyterian and Reformed, [1958] 1964), 65–66 (39)

The two ways in which man becomes a sinner by birth, were not in effect in Jesus, who was kept sinless by the Holy Spirit from conception. (40)
What is the importance of the doctrine of the Virgin Birth?
First...The integrity of Christianity as a religion of redemption stands or falls with its reality. (42)


Second, belief in the virgin birth is important with reference to the authority and trustworthiness of the Bible. (42)

Third, the issue of the virgin birth and incarnation of Jesus is important "as a test for a man to apply to himself or to others to determine whether one holds a naturalistic or a supernaturalistic view regarding Jesus Christ." 54. Machen, The Virgin Birth of Christ, 387. (43)

Fourth, this issue is also important because it makes it impossible for us to separate the “Jesus of history” from the “Christ of faith,”... (44)

Fifth, a person’s knowledge of the Savior would be incomplete without faith that the New Testament passages on the virgin birth are true. (44)

Sixth, "the knowledge of the virgin birth is important because of its bearing upon our view of the solidarity of the race in the guilt and power of sin.… How, except by the virgin birth, could our Saviour have lived a complete human life from the
mother’s womb, and yet have been from the very beginning no product of what had gone before, but a supernatural person come into the world from the outside to redeem the sinful race?" 57. Machen, The Virgin Birth of Christ, 395. (45)

To summarize: believing what the Bible says about the virgin birth of Jesus is vitally important because: (1) If it is rejected the authority of the Bible is denied. (2) It brings before a person the supernaturalness of the person of Jesus. (3) Without the virgin birth, there is something seriously lacking in one’s view of the person and
work of Jesus Christ. (45)
What is Mary's role in the Gospel?

The Roman Catholics place such high esteem upon her that they literally worship her:
It asserts: (1) Her perpetual virginity; (2) Her immaculate conception, i.e., she was conceived without sin; (3) Her glorious assumption, i.e., her resurrection, ascension and enthronement at Christ’s right hand as the “Queen of Heaven”; (4) Her present position as “Co-Redeemer” with Christ. (47)
Contrary to this, however:
The Bible, on the other hand, gives us an accurate, and beautiful, picture of Mary, the mother of Jesus. The highest honor ever given to a woman was conferred upon her by God. The crown and glory of all motherhood was bestowed upon her. She was chosen by God to be the mother of the Son of God. Although she was a sinner in need of a Savior, as she herself admits in Luke 1:47... (47)
Briefly, and finally for today, Dr. Morecraft covers the Council of Chalcedon*. It was held in AD 451 for the purpose of settling a few questions: some of the heresies and some of them (according to the quick run down given in this section), more political. Our main concern is their ruling on the nature and person of Jesus Christ: 
In order to resolve the prevalent heresies and to maintain the truth of the Bible, the response of the Council of Chalcedon was essentially this: Jesus Christ is one person with a truly human nature and a fully divine nature united without detracting from or confusing the characteristics of the human nature with the perfections of the divine nature. (50)
Next week, Lord willing, we shall be addressing the Offices of Christ. Prophet, Priest, and King! Amen and Amen...

      Racheal

* I thought I'd tack on this quick, amusing little story from this past May. :)

Katherine and I were attending one of Dr. Morecraft's lectures and he explained why Chalcedon Presbyterian Church is pronounced "Cal-sah-don" rather than "Cal-See-den" [like Rushdoony said it; or so I hear]: "Because we're from Georgia and it's hot down there...and we don't like to work that hard [to say things "correctly"]." 'Course, Kt and I giggled over that! :)
0 Comments

Of Hair and Weeds...

7/22/2014

1 Comment

 
Greetings! I hope you had a great day! Mine was busy enough, but not crazy...but you'll see that here in a minute.

I didn't do anything spectacular this morning. It was, well, uneventful (I did manage to squeeze in a little guitar playing--it's been days), excepting the fact that I finally did something with my hair that I have wanted to be able to do since I was a little girl. It's what I have always called "Gretel Hair"--more than likely after Gretel Von Trapp out of The Sound of Music. :D

I had sort of done it before, but it was clumsy and didn't stay up well at all. Today I figured out how to make it stay...
Picture
(Savannah has the prettiest bedroom walls!)
Picture
I pinned the ends of my braid across the top of my head (and the sections together right behind my ear to keep the looped braid from flopping).
Needless to say, I was pleased as punch (whatever that expression really means)--but I was DELIGHTED to discover that my hat (aka cowboy hat) would fit with my hair like that! I really didn't think it would.

Anyway, let's move on to the second portion of my title...the weeds.

I pulled the string-trimmer out of the back of the barn and set to work on the very tall (some of them taller than me) weeds out around and behind "Compost Central" (aka the compost bin and pile of stuff that goes into the next batch). There were thistles and lambs tongue and that weed that looks sort of like okra, and a variety of other plants. I broke two sets of stings (grrr!) on lambs tongue before I asked Daddy if he had a hatchet...which of course, he did. After that I used a nice sharp hatchet on anything bigger around than my thumb (and quite a bit of smaller stuff). It kept me from breaking any more strings...and I didn't really mind swinging that small hatchet--it was real sharp so I didn't have to really fight through the very fibrous stems of said plants.

Once I finished around "Compost Central" (too bad I didn't think to take pictures!), I did a row in the garden and then worked around the old, fallen corn-crib until I ran out of gas. I didn't refill (it was around 4:30 by that time), but instead went and tore down my "hay-stack" by the compost bin and rebuilt it behind the bin, layering it up with fertilizer and wetting it. I covered that with a random piece of black plastic; it wasn't big enough to really cover the whole stack completely, but it covered the top well enough. 

Someplace in here, Daddy asked me to help him put this grinder-machine thing up on the flat trailer (nick-named "The Chariot" because it's stated purpose was to put the grandfathers on it and haul them around in their wheelchairs) he had behind the mower. Well, he had been running the engine on the thing (the grinder-machine) and I managed to put the inside of my left forearm on the very hot carburetor (forgive me if I called that the wrong thing). This was the result: 
Picture
It definitely could have been worse...and now that I've come in and smeared plantain salve all over it, it doesn't really even hurt! (And here's a pitch for plantain salve: if you want my momma to make you some [it's good for everything from burns {obviously!} to mosquito bites to random itchy spots to cuts]; you just let me know...I'm sure we could work something out!)

And that's about all the excitement from my day...I sure hope it rains tonight.

      Racheal

1 Comment

Grrrape Vines!

7/21/2014

0 Comments

 
Seriously, yanking grape vines out of trees would make you say it something like that. ;) It reminded me very much of ripping fat pipe-brier vines (which my bull loved by the way) out of the oak trees in Florida (and the fences and anything else they took a mind to grow into). 

These were wild grape-vines that had completely swallowed a peach tree, a mess of currants, and a young maple. 
Picture
There were several loads this size...
I actually rather enjoy this kind of job...as you can probably tell from the following pictures...
Picture
It had also "eaten" that old brick fire-place thing too...I had forgotten that. (And obviously, this was taken after most of the vine was already out.)
Picture
I almost flipped off there backward once...glad I didn't because it would have hurt--and I probably would have mashed the back of my hat!
Picture
A "tree-nymph"...or something. (What a jolly green mustache have I!)
Picture
Being a goofy with the nippers. (Stationed between the peach on my left [right as you view] and the maple and lilac mess on my right [your left]; below are the currant. ;])
After we were done with this, Mama topped the mint and I fed my chickens their mid-afternoon snack and talked to Grandpa for a while (he had come out to watch us work...wearing a jacket and gloves, but I guess once you get to be 91 years old you can wear whatever you like on a warm day. ;D)

I next hauled all the vines up to the burn ring...before addressing the wild grape vine in the Flowering Quince by the drive. (It has really pretty red flowers in the spring.) In the process of that, I decided to chop the dead wood out of the shrubby tree next to the Quince (I do not know what it is, but it has pink flowers on it--the hummingbirds seem to like it). 

Once done with that little chore it was time to feed chickens again. I fed Katherine's first (she was in town with Grandma) and then with Daddy and Savannah's help moved my Rangers (now 7 weeks old!). After feeding them, I watered in the manure. We really need some rain 'round here. I think we are supposed to get some Wednesday...I hope so.

Anyway, that the extent of my afternoon's adventures. What'd you do? :D

     Racheal

0 Comments

The Mediator of the Covenant, Part 1

7/20/2014

0 Comments

 
I started the Volume II of Authentic Christianity today. The chaptering picks up where it left off in Volume I--so "The Mediator of the Covenant" is chapter 13. It covers questions 36-42 of the WLC. I have read further than I did today, but I'm having trouble focusing on the computer screen (I'm reading the PDF version Savannah got with the hardback copy).

Anyway,  it starts with "The Need for a Mediator":
Man is in a fallen and sinful condition (Rom. 3). He is under God’s condemnation, and his sin has separated him from his Maker (Rom. 1–2). ...God’s attitude toward mankind is no longer one of indiscriminating affection. Therefore a mediator is necessary if God is to be placated and if man is to be induced and enabled to turn from his sin to God. ...If fallen man is to be restored to God’s favor, a mediator MUST be provided, because of God’s very nature. Human sin has so offended
and insulted all of God’s glorious perfections, that He MUST be repulsed at it. Everything God is, is against human sin. Everything sin is, is against the holy God. (6)
Who is this Mediator? (See WLC #36.)
The Bible makes absolutely clear that the Lord Jesus Christ of Nazareth is the one and only Mediator between God and men (1 Tim. 2:5). He alone can be that divinely appointed Mediator for two reasons: (1) Only He possesses all the divinely appointed and divinely prophesied traits of that Mediator; and (2) The time has already passed for the Messiah promised in the Old Testament to make His
appearance. (9)
To expand on that second point, Dr. Morecraft explains:
Furthermore, Jesus of Nazareth was the Mediator-Messiah, because of the “fullness of time” in which He lived (Gal. 4:4). The promised Messiah of the Old Testament must have already come, because the time has passed for His coming (Gen. 49:10; Dan. 9:24–27). He was to come while the second Temple in Jerusalem was standing (Hag. 2:6f; Mal. 3:1f), while the Jewish state was still intact (Gen.
49:10), and while Jerusalem was still the capital of the Jewish theocracy (Hag. 2:6f; Isa. 2:3; Isa. 62:1). (10)
More evidence that Jesus is the Mediator:
His most definitive name and title is THE LORD JESUS CHRIST (Acts 11:17; 28:31; 15:26; 20:21). ...The title “Lord” (kurios in Greek), is applied to God in the Greek 
Old Testament and is the equivalent of “Jehovah.” To call Jesus, “Lord,” is to confess Him to be Jehovah incarnate (John 1:14), and to confess that His authority is exalted and supreme (Mark 12:36f; Luke 2:11; 3:4; Acts 2:36; 1 Cor. 12:3; Phil. 2:11). (11)

The name “Jesus” means “Savior.” It is the Greek form of the Hebrew word for “Joshua,” which is derived from two words meaning “Jehovah is our salvation.” (11)

The name, “Christ,” means “the anointed One.”...It points us to the fact that God has appointed and commissioned Jesus to save His people as their Mediator; and that He has fully equipped Him with the Holy Spirit beyond measure to carry out the offices of prophet, priest and king (John 3:34; Ps. 45:7, John 6:27; Matt. 28:18). (12)
Christ is the "only mediator of the covenant of grace".

Having established that we need a mediator and that Christ is that mediator, Dr. Morecraft turns us to a more in-depth look at the person of Christ.
Jesus is fully God and fully man in one person forever, or as the Shorter Catechism says, “God and man in two distinct natures and one person, for ever” (WSC, Q. 21)....The “Word,” who is the Son of God, equal to God, and “of the same substance” with God, came to possess a fully human personality, intellect, soul and body, in addition to His divine being and perfections, which remained unchanged. When we speak of the divine nature of Jesus as being “one substance” with God, and of His human nature as being “of her [Mary’s] substance,” we are saying that Jesus from His conception was really and truly a human being, possessing all the properties of man, making Him fully human; and that He possessed all the perfections of God, (who is His perfections), making Him truly and fully God. Whatever can be said of God can be said about Jesus, and whatever can be said about man can be said about Jesus, except that He was and is sinless....although these two natures are united in one person, yet each retains its respective properties or perfections.(15-16)
First then, the Deity of Christ:
Jesus is God. This is the emphatic and unequivocal testimony of the entire Bible. (17)

First, the Bible gives Jesus names and titles that belong to God alone. He is actually called “God” and “the Son of God” over forty times in the New Testament....In Titus 2:13, we are told to look forward to “the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus.” And Jesus Himself said, “I am the Son of God” ( John 10:36).

Second, the Bible attributes to Jesus perfections that belong to God alone.

Third, the Bible records the words of Jesus which only God can speak. Only God can forgive sins (Mark 2:7), and yet Jesus can say, “My son, your sins are forgiven” (Mark 2:5). Exodus 20 says that the Sabbath is to be sanctified unto Jehovah alone; but Jesus says that He is “the Lord of the Sabbath” (Mark 2:28). 

Fourth, the Bible ascribes works and activities to Jesus which only God Himself can perform. Christ is the Creator of the universe. Speaking of Him, the apostle John wrote: “All things were made by Him and without Him was not anything made that was made” (John 1:3). 

Fifth, the Bible says that we are to give to Jesus Christ the worship and reverence that belong to God alone. Throughout the Bible we are strictly forbidden to worship any mere man, and yet we are commanded to worship Christ, the Son of God. (17-20)
There are six reasons why the mediator of our salvation had to be God Himself (see Q. 38):
(1) His deity kept His humanity from sinking into oblivion under the weight and full force of the infinite wrath of God and the power of death (Acts 2:24f)....human nature united to the divine nature, as in Jesus, would not sink under the weight of
wrath, for if it did sink, “then it would have been said, that he who is a divine Person, miscarried in an important work which he undertook to perform in his human nature, which would have been a dishonour to him.” 18

(2) His deity gave infinite value and eternal effectiveness to His redeeming work as a man in our behalf (Acts 20:28; Heb. 9:14). If the Mediator were only human, sinless though He might be, and although His actions and sufferings were perfect, yet, being a finite creation, nothing He did could be of the infinite value demanded by God’s justice....The Mediator must obey all the demands of God’s Law in such a way that that law is fully honored; therefore the required obedience must not only be sinless, it must be of infinite worth.

(3) As God, Jesus was able to give His Holy Spirit to His people.

(4) Only as Almighty God incarnate could our Mediator conquer all our enemies...

(5) If Christ is to bring His chosen people to everlasting salvation, He must be God....This is all a truly divine work, therefore, He who performs it must be a divine Person.

(6) It is essential that our Mediator, Jesus Christ, should be God, because the everlasting happiness of His people consists in their enjoyment of Him. He not only is the producer of their eternal blessedness, He is the very heart of it.

A seventh reason is that Jesus, our Mediator, had to be God in order to live, even in death, and to give life to those who were dead. No mere man can voluntarily lay down his life in death, and then take it back again....He said, “I lay down My life that I may take it again. No one has taken it away from Me, but I lay it down on My own initiative. I have authority to lay it down and I have authority to take it up
again” (John 10:17f).

18. Ridgeley, Commentary on the Larger Catechism, 1:484. (20-22)
Second, the humanity of Christ (Q. 39):
While remaining no less than God, in possession of all that makes God God, Jesus was, and is, at the same time, really man, possessing all that makes man man. Christ has a true physical body....Being fully human, Jesus had a rational soul. He was not merely half-human and half-divine....As a child, He “increased in wisdom and stature” (Luke 2:52), i.e., intellectually, spiritually and physically. (24)

“It belongs to the truth of our Lord’s humanity, that He was subject to all sinless human emotions.” 24. Benjamin Warfield, The Person and Work of Christ, ed. by Samuel G. Craig (Philadelphia, PA: Presbyterian and Reformed, 1950), 93. (24)

Jesus was neither remote and cold, nor was He dominated by uncontrolled human
emotions. He was warm, personal, and in total emotional control. But the fact that He experienced the whole range of human emotions is testimony to His true humanity. (25)

To be our Savior, Jesus, the Son of God, identified Himself completely with mankind, which involved the assumption of flesh and blood, as well as all human feelings, sensibilities and frailties. By this incarnation He was fully qualified to be our High Priest and our substitutionary sacrifice, turning away God’s wrath from us. Representation and substitution require identification. (25)
Five reasons why our mediator had to be human:
(1) It was necessary for the Mediator to be human “that He might advance our nature.” The greatest honor and dignity to which human nature could be advanced is to be taken into an inseparable union with the Second Person in the Holy Trinity.

(2) It was necessary for the Mediator to be human “that He might… perform obedience to the Law” (Gal. 4:4)....The Law not only demanded punishment for sin, it also demanded perfect obedience from man. Therefore, the obedience of the Mediator had to be performed by a man. 

3) It was necessary for the Mediator to be human “that He might… make intercession for us in our nature” (Heb. 2:14; 7:24, 25). God does not make intercession, for intercession includes worship, and presupposes dependence, which is inconsistent with God’s self-sufficiency and independence. Intercession
is prayer, and only men pray. Therefore, Christ’s making intercession for us is possible because of and the necessary result of His incarnation.

(4) It was necessary for the Mediator to be human “that He might… have a fellow-feeling [sympathy] of our infirmities.”...As the omniscient God, the Mediator has a perfect knowledge of our weaknesses, but not an “experiential knowledge” of them. Only a human being can actually experience weaknesses in his life, having passions and emotions.

(5) It was necessary for the Mediator to be human “that we might receive the adoption of sons, and have comfort and access with boldness unto the throne of grace.” Galatians 4:4–5 makes clear that the Son of God became incarnate to
redeem His people “that we might receive the adoption of sons.”

Since man had sinned against God, man must bear the spiritual and physical penalty for that sin (John 12:27; Acts 3:18; Heb. 2:14; 9:22).

(26-28)
Question 40 deals with why the mediator had to be both God and Man:
The humanity of Jesus Christ never had a separate existence or personality of its own; but from its conception in the womb of Mary, it was united to the second Person of the Trinity, God the Son. This is an intimate, eternal and inseparable union, yet the two natures are not confused, and each retains its own essential human characteristics and divine perfections....To say that the Word became flesh is not to say that the second Person of the Trinity ceased to be God. It is to say that the second Person of the Trinity came to possess human characteristics in addition to His divine perfections, which remained unchanged. God became man in Christ, not by changing Himself into man; but by uniting Himself with man’s nature. (29)

In the incarnation of Christ, the union of the divine Person with the human nature constituted one single person, “which person is very God, and very man, yet one Christ,”(WCF, VIII, ii)....His single, theanthropic (divine-human) personality was not even dissolved in His death. Between His death and resurrection, His physical body and His human soul, although separated in death, were still united with His divine nature. (29)

To be effective in His work as Mediator, Jesus Christ was and is altogether free from sin. (31)

He had to be human so He could actually die. He had to be God so He could continue to live and give infinite value to His death. (31)

In order to reconcile us to God, the works of each nature in Christ must be accepted by God as the works of the whole person....Furthermore, the works of each nature of Christ are to be relied on by believers as the works of the whole divine-human Person of Christ. (33)
Lord willing, next Sunday, we'll pick up with the Virgin Birth...

      Racheal

0 Comments

An Award...

7/19/2014

1 Comment

 
Mmm, yes. My friend (whom I have yet to meet in person) Bethany decided that this littl' ol' blog o' mine need this Liebster award thingy-ma-bop! Well! Thank-you, Bethany! :)

I'll quote Bethany here: "The Liebster Award exists to help bloggers get to know each other and spread the word about your blog and the blogs you love!"  (I suppose I ought to post this picture too. :D)
Picture
There are a few rules that go with this (of course, right?); they go something like this:
#1.  Acknowledge the blog that nominated you. 
#2. Answer the 11 questions the nominating blogger created. 
#3. List 11 bloggers with less than 200 followers that deserve some recognition. 
#4. Write 11 questions for them to answer. 
#5. Notify them they've been nominated.
#1. Check! See above. ;)

#2. Well, here goes:
1. Besides family, who do you admire and why?
   Oh, dear...are you serious? You are? Well, there are many, many folks I admire for various reasons, but I suspect that isn't quite good enough is it? If the person can be a historical character, I will say Stonewall Jackson because he was a man of God and a brilliant general!

2. Awkward Moment?
    An awkward moment. Bethany, you are a stinker! How about those times at the Farmer's Market when I go to chirp "Good-morning!" and it a) either doesn't actually vocalize or b) squeaks on it's way out. :D

3. How do you plan to impact the future for Christ?
    Interesting question. My "plans" are just that...but God ordains what actually comes to pass. I would like to make truth-telling (historical) stories via two mediums: film and novels. One must know where they came from to see where they are going. Can you impact the future by educating in the truth? I believe so. 

4. What makes you laugh?
    Eh...well...a lot of stuff!  It could animals acting like themselves, the wind blowing in my face, a sister or friend's facial expression, something some one says, a piece of music...well, you get the point. I am easily amused. 

5. What do you love about your best friend?
     Why should this one make me draw a blank? I LOVE my best friend...because she is herself! To pin-point one particular just isn't fair! :P Anyway, I think she's put up with her share of listening to me rant about something and chuckling at me as I get wound up tighter and tighter. Love you, Missy!

6. What is something you want to do someday?
     Well...I would like to visit the British Isles someday. And go to every State in the Union.

7. Is there something that you would have never dreamed of doing, yet you are doing today?
    Pardon me while I laugh. There...Absolutely. You want particulars, you say? Okay, you asked for it. Something I never dreamed I would do--wiping a grandfather's behind because he cannot do it himself. Not exactly a job I glory in, but one that I do on occasion take on because Daddy is not available to do it. Praise God I have the ability to do this for my grandfather!

8. What is your favorite state and why?
    Favorite State. *starts to hum "I've Been Everywhere, Man"* Well, I love Louisiana because I spent four wonderful years there and that's where my best friend lives. I love Florida because my roots are there. I like Texas because I just do. :D I really, really like Georgia; partly for the pecans (my favorite nuts) [the groves are gorgeous], partly for the history, partly for the accent. I really do not have a favorite state. I have a favorite region--it's called Dixie. 

9. When I say exciting moment, what comes to mind?
     Time with friends and family--most usually associated with food, good conversation, and dancing!

10. Do you love what you do?
      Totally. I like playing in the dirt, getting grease up my fingernails, making critter noises back at my animals, reading, writing, and playing music. That's my life folks--I enjoy it most of the time. 

11. What are some goals you hope to accomplish?
       Goals. Weellll....short term: finish a couple of project I have started (film and otherwise). Get bees!! Long term: get married (Lord willing) and have a family and all that entails. 

That's my foolish answers to Bethany's questions. :)

#3.List eleven bloggers?? Um...when one starts doing this kind of thing, strange realizations open up. For instance, it turns out that most of the blogs I read, I stalk...in other words, I never comment. So, I only have only a handful that I actually comment on and would thereby be comfortable awarding--it would be strange and weird for some stranger to award another stranger out of the clear blue, wouldn't it? So...I only came up with eight! I may have missed a person or two who's blog I may not actually have book-marked for whatever reason. 
     1: Wandering Words (my younger sister's blog)
     2: Welcome to Our Farm (my Mama's blog)
     3: Thine is the Kingdom (Another one of those via-the-internet friends blog)
     4. Musical Cowgirl for Christ 
     5. Sparks of Reformation (my older sister's blog)
     6. God's Country Boy
     7. Sons of the Kingdom (not exactly a personal blog, but good all the same!)
     8. For Christ's Glory!

#4. A list of eleven questions. (What's the importance of 11?) Anyway, here's my shot at it.
1. What is your favorite historical era(s)?
2. What are you currently reading?
3. Are you a boot or flip-flop kind of person? (Sorry, that one is hopefully the most ridiculous question I'm going to ask!) 
4. Are you logical or illogical by nature? 
5. What is your favorite way to spend time with your family?
6. Which side of your family do you favor in looks?
7. If you lived in 1861--would you have been Federal or Confederate?  
8. If you had lived during the Reformation, which Reformer would you have 'backed' the most heartily?
9. Credo- or Paedo-baptist?
10. What is you favorite caliber?
11. What is the most awesome thing about your dad?

#5. Er, yes. I will start that job as soon as I post this. :)

Have fun ya'll!

      Racheal

1 Comment

Post-Title Brain Fog

7/17/2014

1 Comment

 
There hasn't been over much to blog about the last week...stuff has pretty much been the same ol'. Except for Monday. 

Monday, Mama and I went to town...we skimmed through Goodwill; I was looking for short (aka knee length) denim skirts for working outside. I found one in my size that I liked. I found another two belts (really, I collect the things!) One was multi-colored pig-leather suede. Granted, it looks a a little 1980's or 90's, but I thought it was neat and it fit, so I got it. (Besides, 99 cents for a full leather belt is a steal. I don't buy non-leather. Ever.) 

The other find I 'had-to-have' was a book--a collection of the political writings of Rufus Choate. Ever heard of him? I hadn't, but he appears to have been a conservative statesman from Massachusetts in the early 19th century. (You can probably guess where that ties in in my thinking...)

From there we went to Hobby Lobby--the real reason we went to town. I needed cross-stitch thread so I could finish a project. I had an adventure in the thread department. The thread I needed was a certain number--but I got to looking and the scrap I had with me looked like a different number (embroidery floss has a different number for each color--in case you didn't know that *grin*)...so I got both. As it turns out, it's a good thing I got both, because once I put some of that alternate thread into the project, I realized the number I was supposed to get really was the right color. Very weird.

I also got a hunk of sage green twill for a costume/historical outfit I will be working on in the upcoming months for an upcoming event. Twill (being cotton) would not actually been used in the 1500's in Flanders...but the color is about right and it is cheaper than either wool or linen (which those don't carry at Hobby Lobby anyway that I could see). Besides that, I was planning on using that as a petticoat--but with a few changes in design once I got it home, I'm not quite sure whether it will be hidden or not! My design refining will continue once I actually get started on the project (which, by the way, is going to have a mock up made first because there is no way I am going to be cutting into that red wool of mine before I know I have something that looks decent and fits properly!) 

It gives me pause to sit back and look at how excited I am about my most recent (and upcoming) sewing projects. As a child, I hated sewing. I would always end up angry and in tears over my projects and dreaded the next one. (Therefore, I did very few.) These days, I am actually getting excited and seriously thinking about drafting my own pattern (which I have never done before and don't really have any idea of how to do--Savannah will be getting queried when the time comes.) I look forward to sharing the advance of said project as it gets underway.

Anyway, the rest of the week so far, has been spent doing yard work. In other words, I mowed Tuesday and yesterday I raked up the clippings, picked them up, and put them around the cabbages in the garden. I also flipped compost Monday and Wednesday...

Daddy came home with 2,000 pounds of chicken feed on the trailer and he and I unloaded most of it, but Katherine came and after we were just over half done. I just realized a few minutes ago that is why the right side of my neck is slightly tight (other than the fact that I slept curled up with a crick in my neck)...I carry feed-sacks on my right shoulder.

Starting yesterday, I have upped my chickens feed intake. Four meals a day instead of just three. They are seven weeks and growing. Another five till we are supposed to butcher them. We need to get more ordered.

I like chicken ranching. :)

Anyway, that's my Thursday morning rambles...hopefully, they were somewhat amusing...

      Racheal

1 Comment

The Promise and Work of the Holy Spirit

7/13/2014

0 Comments

 
Chapter 12...the final chapter in Volume One! (In other words, I finished it today!!) 

I started this last week, but didn't get very far because my brain was flat on me...

Anyway, the first section is entitled "The Gift of Faith".
In the Covenant of Grace in Christ, God not only provided a Mediator, freely offers sinners life and salvation in Him, and requires of them faith in Christ so as to receive that life and salvation, but He also “promiseth and giveth his Holy Spirit to all his elect, to work in them that faith, with all other saving graces; and to enable them unto all holy obedience” (WLC, Q. 32; emphasis added). The Westminster
Confession simply says that in the Covenant of Grace, God promises “to give unto all those that are ordained unto life his Holy Spirit to make them willing and able to believe” (WCF, VII, iii). (865)

These two statements from the Catechism and Confession imply several truths. (1) God has elected a certain number of people to eternal life, who are in due time brought to faith in Christ by the Holy Spirit: “as many as had been appointed to eternal life believed” (Acts 13:48). (2) Sinners are in and of themselves unwilling
and unable to believe in Christ: “No one can [is able] come to Me, unless the Father who sent Me draws him” (John 6:44). (3) God promises to give His people the very thing He requires of them: faith in Christ that they might be saved. (865)
The next section is "The Power for obedience".
Along with faith, the Holy Spirit also produces in God’s people “all other saving graces,” thus enabling them “unto all holy obedience.” (866)

Why does an inseparable connection exist between saving faith and “saving graces”? In the Covenant of Redemption between the Father and the Son in eternity, it was agreed that the elect would not only be redeemed from sin’s punishment, but that they would also be saved from sin’s power, sanctified by the Spirit and enabled by Him to live faithful lives, before they were brought into the glory of heaven. (867)

“All holy obedience” refers to what the apostle calls “the obedience of faith” (Rom. 1:5), which is that obedience to God that grows out of and is motivated by faith in Christ, in contrast to a legalistic obedience that obeys God in an effort to merit His blessings....“Faith without works is dead” (James 2:26). When the Holy Spirit renews the heart of a person, bringing him to new life in Christ, He gives him the gift of faith and the desire and ability to obey God’s revealed will: “I will give you a new heart…and I will put My Spirit within you and cause you to walk in My statutes, and you will be careful to observe My ordinances” (Ezek. 36:26–27...). (868)
"The Evidence of True Faith":
James and Paul are not contradictory of each other, they are complementary. Paul is telling us that we are saved by faith in Christ alone; and James is telling us that we are saved by a faith that is not alone, but which proves itself in obedience to Biblical Law....Paul uses Genesis 15 to prove the necessity of faith; James uses Genesis 22 to prove the necessity of “holy obedience” as proof of true faith. (870)

The point of this passage in James is a fundamental one: genuine faith produces an obedient life; and therefore, an obedient life is sure evidence of saving faith. (870)
"The Evidence of Gratitude to God":
This “holy obedience” that is rooted in faith in Christ is also sure evidence of the genuineness of “thankfulness to God.” (871)
Dr. Morecraft again turns us toward the Covenant(s); naturally, he starts us with the Old Testament, but not before he reminds us that Old and New are two administrations of the same covenant.
The Bible reveals one great Covenant of Grace, manifested in several historical covenants, which Covenant over-arches and unifies the Old Testament and the New Testament structurally and thematically. (873)
That done, he briefly touches on the revelations and ordinances of the Old Testament, followed with even briefer comments on the purpose of said revelations and ordinances.

Therefore, the revelations and ordinances: 
The Covenant of Grace was administered in the Old Testament by promises (Rom. 15:8), prophecies (Acts 3:20, 24), sacrifices (Heb. 10:1), circumcision (Rom. 4:11), the passover (1 Cor. 5:7), and by various other types, ceremonies and ordinances, viz., the Tabernacle and its furniture and the Levitical priesthood. (875)

Types are those actions, names and personages in the Old Testament that foreshadowed, or “fore-signified” Christ....(1) They are rooted in history (Matt.
12:40; John 3:14). (2) They are prophetic in nature (Gen. 14; Heb. 7). (3) They are divinely designed as an integral part of redemptive history....(1 Cor. 10:1–11). (4) They are Christ-centered, pointing to Him in one way or another (Luke 24:24, 44; Acts 3:24–26). (5) They are edifying and have meaning to believers in both dispensations (Deut. 30:6; Hosea 14:2; Zech. 6:9–15). (875)
The purpose:
The purpose of the revelations, ordinances and types of the Old Testament was to fore-signify Christ and to build up the elect of God in faith in the promised Messiah. (876)
"The Blessings of Full Forgiveness of Sins and Eternal Salvation in the Old Testament":
The church in the Old Testament had a clearer understanding of Christ in the ceremonies, ordinances and types of that administration than is commonly recognized today....Furthermore, the Old Testament believers also experienced more profound spiritual blessings than is commonly recognized today. In fact, what believers in the New Testament experienced, the Old Testament believers experienced, but not in the same measure of light, clarity, power and abundance. (878)

More specifically, for example, full forgiveness of sins and eternal salvation were not merely promises to the Old Testament believers which the New Testament church could expect; they were blessed privileges actually enjoyed by the Old Testament church as many of the Psalms teach us. (878)
We are briefly turned to the administration of the Covenant in the New Testament, with a focus on Christ being the substance of the Old Testament ordinances and types.
Jesus Christ is the substance of both the Old Testament and the New Testament administration of the Covenant of Grace. (879)
Dr. Morecraft points out the ordinances of the Covenant in the New Testament...

First, how many are there?
Since the coming of Jesus Christ and to the very end of history, the Covenant of Grace is administered “in the preaching of the Word and the administration of the sacraments of Baptism and the Lord’s Supper” (WCF, VII, vi). (880)
Second, what is the nature of these ordinances?
In 2 Corinthians 3:9, Paul is comparing and contrasting the older covenant and the
New Covenant, and he states: “For if the ministry of condemnation [the older covenant] has glory, much more does the ministry of righteousness [the New Covenant] abound in glory.”...Thus, the New Testament saving ordinances, although less ornate and fewer, are more powerful and less obscure than the Old Testament ordinances, because, in the preached Word, we offer a Savior who has come and is present, who has actually accomplished eternal salvation for all His people once-for-all. The sacraments no longer “fore-signify” Christ to come, but are signs and seals of the crucified, risen, and exalted Christ, present with His people by His Spirit in the Word and sacraments. (881)

Hebrews 12:22–29 also speaks to the greater power, clarity and glory of the New Covenant, as well as the greater accountability to obey God’s Law of those who are members of it, than those who were under the older covenants. (881-882)
Finally, the phrase "To All Nations":
Because the Church is now one body with no ethnic distinctions, the mission of the Church is to make the world’s nations Christ’s disciples, because Christ “wast slain, and didst purchase for God with (His) blood men from every tribe and tongue and people and nation. And…hast made them to be a kingdom and priests to our God” (Rev. 5:9). (883)
That concludes Chapter 12, but I would like to give you my notes on the Appendix. The subject is what is commonly known as "Federal Vision". (Dr. Morecraft quotes extensively from John Murry in this appendix--I would recommend reading the appendix yourself for the full arguments. I fear my report may be slightly confusing without all the minute details.)

Without further ado then, point 1:  "A New View of the Covenant Creeping in Largely Unnoticed". 
This view is such a radical paradigm shift that it can affect every aspect of one’s understanding of God and salvation. The focus of this new view is on what its adherents call “the objectivity of the covenant.” (884)

According to their teaching, being baptized into the organized church is equivalent to entering into the covenant of God.... For them, to be in the visible church is to be “in Christ.” So, they say, by water-baptism God incorporates a person into Christ and, being “in Christ,” from that moment God promises that person all the blessings of the salvation that are in Christ—regeneration, justification, adoption, sanctification—unless he should apostatize and be excommunicated, at which time he would no longer be “in Christ”and therefore would lose the salvation he did in fact possess so long as he was a member of the organized church. They teach that, since Christ is “the elect one,” a person’s union with Christ by water-baptism 
proves that person is also one of the elect of God. Thus, in their view, excommunication makes a baptized person no longer one of the elect, since he is no longer “in Christ.” According to their teaching, God promises all who are baptized the blessings of salvation, but of a salvation that can be lost after it has been possessed. This means, if we follow their view, that divine election and divine reprobation are not irreversible. (884-885)

Therefore, according to this new view, in the New Testament’s teaching on the covenant of God, election can be possessed and lost; union with Christ can be possessed and lost; “baptismal regeneration” can be possessed and lost; justification, adoption and sanctification can be possessed and lost. (885)

This new view of “the objectivity of the covenant” goes off track by failing to keep clear two Biblical distinctions: first, the distinction between the corporate election of Israel as a nation (in the Old Testament) and the soteric election of individuals in Christ (in both Testaments), and second, the distinction between being baptized
into the organized church and being incorporated into Christ. (885)
The second section addresses the first of those two distinctions: "The Theocratic Election of Israel as a Nation".
In the Old Testament, Israel was chosen by Jehovah nationally to receive special privileges and to be set apart from all the nations of the world for the purpose of bringing salvation to the world in the Messiah. (885)

This theocratic election of the nation of Israel, however, did not guarantee either the eternal salvation of the nation or of all the individuals within that nation. Therefore, it is to be distinguished from the particularized and soteric election of individuals within the nation to eternal life, which doctrine is taught in the Old Testament (1 Kin. 19:18; Ps. 95:8–11; Isa. 1:9; 10:22,23), as well as in the New Testament (Eph. 1:3f; Rom. 9:22; John 15:16). (886)

As privileged as ancient Israel was to be nationally elected by God, that theocratic election, as her theocratic adoption, was inferior to the soteric election and adoption of individuals in Christ. (887)
"The Soteric Election of Individuals in Christ":
Jesus made the point that the elect must be saved eternally, when He said, concerning the fall of Jerusalem, that “unless those days had been cut short, no life would have been saved; but for the sake of the elect those days shall be cut short” (Matt. 24:22). (889)

The point of this discussion is simply this: election as it is explained in the New Testament is soteric election that infallibly causes the person elected to receive all the blessings of the eternal salvation to which he was elected. It is not dependent upon anything in the elect, nor can it be reversed. Hence, not all who are baptized are the elect, for not all baptized people go to heaven when they die. Furthermore, the phrase “in Christ” is not to be identified with membership in the organized church by baptism; nor does it denote some external covenant membership by a baptized unbeliever. When a person is “in Christ,” he or she eternally possesses all the eternal, and therefore unlosable, benefits of salvation that are applied to us by virtue of our being in union and communion with Christ. 33 Over against this view is that of Douglas Wilson and the others who hold to this new view of covenant objectivity: “So there is such a thing as genuine covenantal connection to Christ which is not salvific at the last day.” (Reformed is NotEnough, 133). Wilson’s and Shepherd’s interpretation of the vine and branches parable of John 15 also represents this new view. (891)
"Baptism and Union with Christ":
The new view on the objectivity of the covenant includes a doctrine of baptism that approaches that of Roman Catholicism. It holds that by water-baptism a person is brought by God into union with Christ as the source of his promised salvation. Therefore union with Christ, being described by this view as a covenantal union, is an objective relationship—being “in Christ” is being in the organized church; hence it is not only an objective-external relationship, it is a conceivably losable relationship. (892-893)

Although a person has been chosen in Christ before the creation of the universe (Eph. 1:4), and redeemed by the death of Christ two thousand years ago (Gal. 3:13), he does not become an actual recipient of the benefits of that salvation until they are effectively applied to him by the Holy Spirit of God. (893)

We are “in Christ” and Christ is “in us,” if Christ’s Spirit dwells in us. He is the bond of this union we have with Christ. (893)

...“every believer is personally united directly to Christ. The representation that the life which is in the Church through Christ flows from the Church into the individual
believer is decidedly unscriptural, not only in its sacramentarian but also in its pantheistic form (Rome, Schleiermacher, and many modern theologians). Every sinner who is regenerated is directly connected with Christ and receives his life from Him,”...42. Berkhof, Systematic Theology, 450–51. (894)

Water baptism is a sign and seal of this union and communion we have with Christ (Gen. 17:7–14; Rom. 6:3–6; 1 Cor. 12:13; Gal. 3:27, 28; Col. 2:11,12). (895)
We are baptized into Christ...
First, we are adopted into God’s family through faith in Jesus Christ: “for you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus.” Faith, not baptism, is the means of that adoption, as Galatians 3:26 and John 1:12 make unmistakably clear....Therefore, as soon as a person believes in Jesus Christ, in that very moment he is adopted into God’s family, whether that is before or after his baptism with water. (896)

Second, we are adopted into God’s family by virtue of our union with Jesus Christ: “For all of you … were baptized into Christ.” (896)

Third, our union with Christ is signified and sealed to us by water baptism. (897)
"The Meaning of Baptism as a Sign and Seal":
We learn in the first paragraph ([WCF]28:1) that the purpose of baptism is twofold: (1) For the solemn and public admission of a person into the institutional church; and (2) To be a sign and seal of that person’s participation in the salvific blessings of God’s covenant through faith in Jesus Christ. The second paragraph (28:6) also teaches us two truths about the “efficacy” of baptism: (1) It is not
inseparably tied to the moment in which water baptism is administered; and (2) By the right use of baptism the grace promised is not only offered, but really exhibited and conferred, by the Holy Ghost to those to whom saving grace has been promised and therefore to whom it properly belongs, i.e., the elect (Eph. 1:3–4). The point here is that baptism is an effective means of grace to those to whom that grace is promised and to whom it belongs. To them that saving grace is not only offered, but really exhibited and conferred by the mysterious work of the Holy Spirit. (900-901)

In baptism as a sign, “God condescends to our weakness… He also advertises that great truth [of our union with Christ] by an ordinance which portrays visibly to our senses the reality of this grace. It is a testimony which God has been pleased to give to us so that we may the better understand the high privilege of union with the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.”54 Further,

"[As a seal, baptism] authenticates, confirms, guarantees the reality and security      of this covenant grace. It is not indeed indispensable to the grace sealed; the           grace exists prior to the seal and the seal does not produce the grace sealed. ...
    
"It is apparent that as a sign or seal [water baptism] should not be identified with that which is signified and sealed....The sign or seal presupposes the existence of that which is signified or sealed. Hence baptism is the sign and seal of a spiritual reality which is conceived of as existing. Where that reality is absent the sign or seal has no efficacy.…55 54. Murray, Christian Baptism, 87. 55. Murray, Christian Baptism, 86–87.(901-902)
"The Meaning of 'Baptism Now Saves You' [I Peter 3:20-21]":
Each word is important. (1) “Baptism” is a sign and seal of salvation. (2) “Now” is a word often used by Peter in his first epistle (1:6; 1:12; 2:10; 2:25). It denotes the time of the new covenant, “the last days,” the day of salvation, the reign of Christ, the dawn of the age to come in history in Christ. (3) “Saves” is in the present tense
denoting “continuing saving.” The sign and seal of the covenant continues the effects of salvation in us, which are ours by grace through faith (Eph. 2:8–9; Acts 16:31)....(4) The pronoun, “us,” refers to those who possess salvation by faith, “who are chosen according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, by the sanctifying work of the Spirit, that you may obey Jesus Christ and be sprinkled with His blood: May grace and peace be yours in fullest measure” (1 Pet. 1:1–2). (905-906)

How then does baptism save? Peter gives a twofold answer.
(1) Its saving efficacy is inseparable from “a good conscience,” i.e., a conscience “cleansed…from dead works to serve the living God” (Heb. 9:14), by “the blood of Christ” (9:14), “through faith” (Rom. 3:25).
(2) Its efficacy is “through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, who is at the right hand of God” (vv. 21–22). Without Christ’s resurrection, intercession and reign at God’s right hand, which presupposes His prior death and burial, baptism would be an empty ritual. (907)

As circumcision in the Old Testament, baptism, as a sign of the covenant, places the one baptized into a realm of God’s special blessings and special curses (Deut. 28; Lev. 26). If that person lives faithfully and in accordance with what his baptism signifies, because he has truly received from God the spiritual realities it signifies by grace through faith (Eph. 2:8–9; John 3:16), God shall bestow upon him rich covenant blessings. (909)
"The Sacramental Mode of Speaking":
The actions of the resurrected Christ signified and sealed in the sacraments are sometimes spoken of in terms of the visual signs that represent them (Ezek. 36:22;
Ps. 50:8; Matt. 26:27, 28; Rom. 6:4; Col. 2:11, 12; Gen. 17:10, 13; Ex. 13:21; 34:5; Ps. 47:6). This is proper because there is in every sacrament a spiritual relation, or sacramental union, between the sign and the thing signified; whence it comes to pass that the names and effects of the one are attributed to the other (WCF, XXVII, ii). (910)
"The Essence of the Covenant of God":
Entering the covenant is not to be identified with being baptized into the organized church. (912)

God’s covenant, at heart, is “a relationship of friendship between God and man, a communion of life, in which man is made to share in the divine life” according to Lewis Bevens Schenck. 70 Lewis Bevens Schenck, The Presbyterian Doctrine of Children in the Covenant, (Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed, [1940] 2001), 6. (912)
"The Relation of Baptism and the Covenant". Before going further, I'd like to sum up something I gathered from the  Murry quotes: "in" the Covenant does not equal up to the same thing as being "of" the Covenant! Two-letter propositions really do make a difference!
...if baptism is to be a means of grace assuring a person of his participation in the covenant life and bond with the triune God: (1) It must be used rightly, i.e., received with faith in Jesus Christ. (2) The person baptized must be one to whom the saving grace of God’s covenant belongs, i.e., he must be one of God’s elect
in Christ....(3) The time and specific nature of the efficacy of baptism in God’s elect is sovereignly determined by the good pleasure of God. (915-916)

First, it is possible for an unregenerate, and even non-elect, person to be baptized and thereby be publicly initiated into the visible church, either upon a credible profession of faith in Christ and the Bible, or as a child of the covenant, being born of a baptized parent....Only God can see the heart. At the same time, among the children of believers there are Esau’s and Ishmaels, who are not in communion with God because they are devoid of faith, but who do bear the sign of the covenant. (916)

Second, the visible church is the covenant community of God. It is that body of people who bear the sign of the covenant, who have confessed faith in the covenant God, and who have publicly professed that they will be wholly and only the Lord’s, along with their children. Not all who make these public and objective commitments are in communion with God (Matt. 7:22–23). (916-917)

Third, the covenant relationship that God has established with His people in Christ has two aspects to it: (1) A communion of life with God based on the redemptive work of Christ; and (2) A sovereignly-dictated order of life by the covenant Lord, consecrating those who bear the sign of the covenant to Himself. (919)
"Conclusion":
Not all who have received the sign of the covenant, i.e., baptism, are in possession of covenant life and communion with God. The salvific promise of the covenant is made to believers and their seed organically in that the true and elect seed of God is to be found ordinarily among the natural descendants of those who are baptized into the organized church. Only the true seed are in union and communion with Christ. God does not promise to bestow salvation on each and every person who is baptized. (923)

Since the promise of the covenant is made to Christ’s Church organically and corporately, we are to consider all those who have been baptized and have made a credible profession of faith in Christ and the Bible to be the regenerate sons and daughters of God, along with their children, unless by their lives they prove themselves to be apostate and are excommunicated. (924)

...when it comes to our covenant children, we are to view them in the light of the revelation of God to us in His Word, i.e., in terms of the promise of the covenant: “And I will establish My covenant between Me and you and your seed after you
throughout their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be God to you and to your seed after you” (Gen. 17:7). (926)

In other words, we must not separate our faith in God’s promise concerning our children from our sustained faithfulness in their Christian nurture. (927)
End Volume 1 of Authentic Christianity by Dr. Joe Morecraft III.

     Racheal

0 Comments

July 12th, 2014

7/12/2014

2 Comments

 
Mothers are wise. Don't ever doubt that.

Case in point: this afternoon, mine gave me the encouragement I needed to spur me onto something I really needed to tackle. She did so in the form of an imperative--"Go clean your room." :D

By that she meant, "get up there and vacuum the cat-hair off your floor! No wonder your nose is stuffed up!"

Okay, so I hopped up, mid-strum (I was playing my guitar), located the vacuum, the lemon oil (for dusting; I do not know when the last time I dusted was!)...hauled up the bag of cat-litter (the litter box needed changing as much as the floor needed vacuuming) and set to work. 

I dusted, vacuumed, deep cleaned (sort of), and ended up moving some of my furniture around! I think I will really like it once I get used to it.
Picture
Have I showed you the screen-door Daddy made for my room out of chicken-wire? This allows the air to move a little more freely...
Picture
*Gasp* I can see my bookshelf!!! I moved that table--it was where the clothes rack now is and the clothes rack was where the table is. (Excuse the ironing pile...I really do need to get around to that too!)
Picture
I am hoping that the lamp will stay upright and that Curio will not knock it over and break the light bulb--again! I can also get to my radio again which is really nice!
Picture
Yes, the cats are still getting used to it...they have been going around sniffing everything to make sure it's safe! :D (I use this clothes rack because I cannot get my clothes in the closet with Katherine's. Yes, we probably have a few too many...)
Picture
It warms my heart to see a portion of my magnet collection back up on the wall! These are mainly my 'military' magnets (there are a few non-military ones up there.) I have oodles of State and National park magnets too. And the occasional, random, odd one from places like a gator farm...
All told, I think it was a pretty profitable afternoon and I'm glad Mama told me to go clean my room. :)

     Racheal

2 Comments

Rambly Thought on Reconstruction

7/7/2014

0 Comments

 
So...I got to thinking again. Something about a two word phrase I thought up sparked another train of related thought.

You see, during Southern "Reconstruction" [I put it in quotations because it's a word the does not really fit], the defeated Southerner's had no real legal recourse against any Yankee (dare I say?) tyranny. Now that is not to justify any of the unlawful (using the word "lawful" in a biblical sense) things that the Southerner's may have done; I'm just pointing out that the South had no legal recourse, so it is quite natural that the "law" would end up being tyrannical (from both directions) and of the vigilante sort.

But to come back to the point at hand--because former Confederates were not, under Radical Republican "Reconstruction", citizens of the United States (we will not discuss the legality of secession here as that would bog us down), they had none of the rights granted citizens under the Constitution. On top of that, their states were under Marital Law which, as far as I can tell, seems to suspend (at least in this case) normal judicial activity. Taking all that into account, they could be pressed and squeezed and mistreated without being able to protect themselves through legal channels. (By the way, I'm not saying all the Yankee's were as hard-hearted and cruel as, say, Thaddeus Stevens...)

This was sure to pose a quandary to many a gallant soldier. What was he to do to protect (again) his home and family and way of life?

I am sure many wished heartily to take up arms yet again. Indeed, the beloved general of the South, Robert E. Lee himself remarked that if he had known what Reconstruction would be, he never would have surrendered--and you probably know that General Lee was one of the strongest advocates of living at and in peace with the northern portion of the country. But--that was not an option (here is that word again) legally (which is probably one of the reasons it didn't happen). 

Why?

Well, let's return back to our theology for the answer to that question. (I wish I had my notes from Calvin's Institutes handy! I will try to roughly exposit my remembrances of what he said.)

First--governments are granted their authority by God (one of three jurisdictions). Therefore, they are to be obeyed in as far as obedience does not mean disobedience to God. 


Second--because governments are ordained by God, a citizen's lone, arbitrary disregarding of them (could call this anarchy), is wrong.

Third--in the Republican form of government (based actually upon the Presbyterian governmental form [King George recognized this in the war of 1776]), there are differing levels of governmental authority, besides being the different branches (judicial, legislative, and executive). One governmental layer down holds (or can hold) the next one up accountable. (They should.) Therefore, legally, a lesser magistrate only can lead what would be called a 'rebellion' against the state. 

Now, going back to our original topic--any armed resistance on the part of the defeated South against the Yankee tyrant would have been unbiblical in the sense that there was no legal, lesser magistrate to lead it. Beside, to be entirely pragmatic...I doubt it would have done much good because the manpower of the South was drastically reduced, they had no money, or means of arming, equipping, and supporting men on the field. But that is not the point, the point is, being without legal recourse, because they had been stripped (I would argue, unconstitutionally) of their citizenship they had no lesser magistrates (and to begin with, the ones they did have were simply Radical stooges) and therefore, no representation. (And I think I sorta did one of those logical jump thingys that I cannot remember the name of right there.)

And those are my 'putting-clean-sheets-on-the-bed' rambles (expanded). Forgive me if there are gaps in the thought process...or something. The subject is huge and expansive and I myself have barely scratched the surface of it. But...my mind does go down these channels and I have to write them down to solidify them in an at lease semi-articulate fashion.

     Racheal

P.S. I quite enjoyed that article I linked above...
0 Comments
<<Previous
    New post on The Bee Project! 04/26/18
    Picture

    The Middle Kid

    I chose to title this blog "The Adventures of a Middle Kid" because that is exactly what I'll be detailing (mostly). I chose 'kid' over any other word, like 'girl' (I am the middle girl so it also would have worked) or 'child'
    (since I am no longer exactly a child).

    I am a middle kid and I will always be a middle kid--even when I'm 80!

    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013

    Follow
    Picture
    The anti-Christ will not overrun Christ’s church or kingdom.
    Christ will win. He is winning. He has won. --Joe Morecraft, III
    Picture

    Categories

    All
    1942 Truck Restoration
    Accidents
    Agriculture
    Authentic Christianity
    Books
    Caretaking
    Cats
    Cattle
    Chickens
    Church
    Confederates
    Conference
    Cooking
    Costumes
    Cow Cavalry
    Family
    Farmers Market
    Filmmaking
    Food
    Friends
    History
    Holidays
    Horse
    Knitting
    Lyme/Co Infections
    Lyme/Co-Infections
    Mechanics
    Movies
    Music
    Musings
    Musket Echos
    Nonesense
    Pictures
    Politics
    Reenacting
    Rodeo
    Sewing
    Shooting
    Theology/Philosophy
    Video
    War Between The States
    Weather
    Weddings
    Work
    Writing
    WWII

    Picture

    Picture
    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Picture
    Picture
    FREEDOM'S LIGHT FILMS
    Picture
    Picture
    Reformed Reviews
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    www.fold3.com
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    7 Lb.s of Bacon Mess Band
    Picture
    Picture
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.