The Adventures of a Middle Kid
  • Blog
  • About Me
  • Contact
  • Extra! Extra!
    • The War Between the States--A Journal
    • Book List
  • The Bee Project

Sewing Projects...

10/30/2014

2 Comments

 
Seriously, for a kid who despised sewing for the majority of her life, I have been doing a lot of it lately!

After spending last week in bed with a cold, I finally got around to sewing the commission that had to be done by this weekend. It was Savannah's project, but when she took that impromptu trip to the home state of some of the most famous and heroic men in American history, I agreed to do it.  The project: two sets of crib sheets (plus an extra top sheet), three receiving blankets, three burp cloths (made from the left over flannel of the blankets), and one crib blanket. That last was a bit of a booger. I have decided that I would rather not sew with "minkie" again. However, you will be pleased to know that I did not throw any temper tantrums nor did I even growl about any of it. I did get a little frowny yesterday, but half of that was new killers and overcast weather, so I didn't feel overly well. 

Anyway, I completed the job this morning with the hand work on the burp cloths; because they had to be turned, there was some hand stitching that needed doing to close them.
Picture
Sheet sets.
Picture
Burp cloths and receiving blankets.
Picture
The crib blanket! The opposite side is smooth minkie, not that bubbly stuff.
By the way, these things are for a little girl. I know, they do look more like "boy" colors for the most part, but the mama didn't want all pink and so the auntie (our costumer) went with these. Personally, I like that green. :)

Well, I did something else this morning. I tackled that very obnoxious ironing board cover.
Picture
Believe me, those rips are a pain to work around--whether ironing or using the board as a sewing table.
I have been planning this for a couple of days and had the perfect piece of material in mind...so I went to the basement and scrounged until I found it.
Picture
It was a piece of old ticking that Grandma had removed from a mattress at some point in her thrifty career. I whacked into it glibly and the following was the result.
Picture
The next thing was to find the right size bias tape. Therefore, I ended up with dual colors:
Picture
They are hidden, so no problem...besides, it's just an ironing board, right??
I stitched it on and threaded the ribbon through it. The pattern I had seen on the internet used elastic, but we didn't have enough, so I just used ribbon...and cinched it down fairly tight. I did stick a few pins in the bottom to hold it up, but all told I think it came out very well!
Picture
(Excuse me while I imagine this to be an aircraft carrier....)
Picture
I think Mama likes it!
I have one other incomplete project that I'm working on...but I'll save that for a separate post. ;)

Now, I'm off to clean my room!  

     Racheal

2 Comments

Chicken Dentistry 

10/27/2014

1 Comment

 
This afternoon, when I went out to feed my chickens their lunch, I noticed one bird standing a little apart with a piece of plastic tarp sting hanging out of his mouth. Upon closer examination, I realized he was attached to the tarp via that wispy plastic string!

With a little patience and determination, I reached under the tractor while lifting it at the same time, and caught the little booger. Well, due to circumstances, I knew I had to detach the bird from the tarp before I could pull him out from under the tractor...so hanging onto his legs, I grubbed around in my pants pocket until I got ahold of my knife. (Providence...I decided to wear pants this morning for some reason; if I hadn't I wouldn't have had my knife more than likely [most of my skirts lack pockets].) I managed to open it one handed (the sheepsfoot blade is the only one loose enough) and had to do some interesting finger contortions to work the tarp string and the knife through the chicken wire at the same time. (The whole time I was holding a squirming chick by the legs with my left hand.)

Once I succeeded in loosing the little guy, I hauled him out, pried his beak open and went, "Oh." 

The string was wrapped around the back of his tongue. 

I observed, poked, and then found Daddy. He held the bird and I tried to unwind the sting. No go. He suggested a pair of tiny scissors he has and told me where to find them. I dashed off and found them and tried again. I couldn't quite get the tips under the string (it was tight), so Daddy got to thinking a little more and remembered another pair of tiny scissors he has, only those had a little semi-circle hook on the end. He handed me the bird and soon came back with them. After a couple of snips, he succeeded in cutting through the string and I took the little bird back to his pals. He was glad to get away from me!!

Anyway, in addition to being just a rather interesting occurrence, I took a better look down a chicken's gullet than I had really taken in the past. They have these ragged, rough places in their throats and the back of their tongues--chicken "teeth" so to speak. But anyway, I am pleased to say that that chicken is no long bound up by any nasty plastic...(and I yes, I did remove the remaining free-floating end from the coop!) 

      Racheal

1 Comment

The Church of Christ, Part 4

10/26/2014

0 Comments

 
I was hoping to finish up this chapter today, but I guess it didn't happen. I didn't even get entirely through the part discussing the visible church.

Anyway, we begin with the unity of the visible church, starting with it's historical unity.
“There is only one people of God, the church, established in the Old Testament and brought to maturity in the New Testament.” 250. Randy Booth, Children of the Promise: The Biblical Case for Infant Baptism (Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Co., 1995), 82. (484-485)
Dr. Morecraft goes through 10 passages (or sets of passages) demonstrating this:
Hebrews 3:2-6: In this text, the unity and continuity of the church in the Old
Testament and New Testament are pictured in the figure of a “house” that is under construction...(a) Both Moses and Jesus are building ONE HOUSE, not two. (b) The house Moses and Jesus are building is “His house,” i.e., it belongs to Jesus (3:2). (c) Although both Moses and Jesus are builders of this one house, Jesus is far superior to Moses, because Moses is only a faithful “servant” in the house, and Jesus is the owner, “the Son over His house” (vs. 6), and the ultimate “builder” of the house, with Moses as His instrument and tool (vs. 3–4). (d) Jesus’ one house, built by Jesus Himself for Himself using Moses as His instrument is the Church...We are being taught here that the church of Christ is one in the Old Testament and the New Testament. (485)

Acts 7:38: The organization of the covenant people of God in the Old Testament
is expressly called “the congregation in the wilderness,” and the Greek word for “church” or “congregation” is ekklesia in this text. (485)

Romans 9:24-26/Hosea 1:10-11: In Hosea 1:10–11, we are given a prophecy regarding “the sons of Israel;” and in Romans 9:24–26, Paul, without hesitation, applies this very passage to the church of Christ. He can do this, because the church of God is one in the Old Testament and New Testament. (485-486)

Hebrews 8:6-13/Jeremiah 31: 31-34: In Jeremiah 31:31–34, the prophet speaks of a New Covenant that Jehovah will make with “the house of Israel and with the house of Judah.” Hebrews 8:6–13 quotes this passage, “which speaks so plainly and specifically of Israel and Judah, and applies it to the church of the new covenant.”
251. Booth, Children of the Promise, 84. (486)

Romans 11:17-24: Paul uses the imagery of an olive tree to show us that the church of the Old Testament continues under the New Covenant....the tree remained healthy and the Gentile branches of a wild olive tree were grafted into it. (486)

I Peter 2:9/Exodus 19:5-6

Galatians 3:15-22: The covenant God made with Abraham in Genesis 12–17 still
stands....As the children of believers were members of that covenant (Gen. 17:7), “the inference is irresistible that they are members still, unless their positive exclusion can be pointed out in the New Testament.” 255 Robert L. Dabney, Lectures In Systematic Theology, (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, [1878]1975), 783 (487-488)

Galatians 3:28-29; 6:16: In these texts, once again, the New Testament gives the church of Christ names and descriptions that originally were applied to the
covenant people of God in the Old Testament....This means that, as under the Abrahamic Covenant, the “spiritual seed” is to be found among the “physical seed” of believers, hence, as in the Old Testament, believers and their children are taken into covenant with God in the New Testament church. For this reason, the church of Christ is called “the Israel of God” in 6:16. (488)

Hebrews 12:22: The author of Hebrews uses Old Testament imagery to describe the privileges and blessings of church members through faith in Jesus Christ. In coming “to Jesus the Mediator of a new covenant,” we are coming to “Mount Zion,” where God’s covenant people worshipped Him in the Temple, to “the city of the living God,” which is “the heavenly Jerusalem.” (489)

Ephesians 2:12, 19-20: Until reconciled to God by the blood of Christ (2:13), unbelievers today, as unbelieving Gentiles in the Old Testament, are outside
the church of God...Therefore, to use Paul’s own words, to be outside the Christian Church is to be “separate from Christ, EXCLUDED FROM THE COMMONWEALTH
OF ISRAEL, AND STRANGERS TO THE COVENANTS OF PROMISE, having no hope and without God in the world” (2:12; emphasis added). (489)
The spiritual unity of the visible church:
The Holy Spirit is the creator of this spiritual unity of the church in Christ. This “one Spirit” forms “one body” and calls God’s chosen people to “one hope of your calling.” In the church there is “one faith” in “one Lord” signified and sealed by “one baptism,” where we worship and serve our “one God and Father.” (490)
Unity in Truth:
The concreteness of this Spiritual unity of the church is seen in the church’s united commitment to and confession of “the faith which was once for all handed down to the saints” (Jude 3), i.e., that completed body of revealed truth in the Bible which all true Christians believe. (490-491)
Division in the visible church:
"Evil as well as good is included in the divine purpose. It is purposed not as evil, but for the sake of the good which infinite wisdom evolves from it.… By the prevalence of disorders and other evils in the church, God puts his people to the test. They are tried as gold in the furnace, and their genuineness is made to appear. It is a great consolation to know that dissensions, whether in the church or in the state, are not fortuitous, but are ordered by the providence of God, and are designed, as storms, for the purpose of purification." 263. Hodge, A Commentary on the First Epistle to the Corinthians, 218. (493)
The Catholicity of the Visible Church:
In the Apostles’ Creed, we confess: I believe in the Holy Ghost; the holy catholic Church; the communion of saints…There is nothing suspicious about the word “catholic.” It means “universal, supra-national, transcending national, racial and all ethnic boundaries.” (494)

First, the church is catholic in that it is universal....The church’s catholicity is rooted in the scope of the redemptive work of Christ, who purchased “men from every tribe and tongue and people and nation” (Rev. 5:9).


The church is no longer confined to one nation as was largely true in the Old Testament. Now it consists of all those throughout the world—in all ages and places of the world—who credibly profess the Christian religion, together with their children.

Second, the church is catholic in that it is identical. In other words the church is catholic in space and in time. Throughout its history from the Old Testament to the present, the church cannot and does not alter her basic nature. She is always comprised of those who credibly profess the Christian religion along with their children.

Third, the church is catholic in that it is orthodox. Her orthodoxy guarantees her continuous self-identity. The church is orthodox in that her foundation is in the “apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus Himself being the chief corner stone” (Eph. 2:20).


Fourth, the church is catholic in that it is continuous.

To say that the church is continuous throughout history is to say that the church is indestructible....Individual congregations and denominations may come and go, but the church of Christ on earth will never perish.

The continuance of the church is not something automatic. It is indestructible because God preserves it and provides for it....He will never allow His church to be completely overwhelmed with heresy. He will renew His church and lead her into all truth by the presence and work of His Holy Spirit.

Fifth, “catholicity” refers to the wholeness and fullness of the church’s faith and life in Christ.
(495-499)
Dr. Morecraft asks the question: "Can there be such a thing as boundaries to a catholic church?" 
First, there are no boundaries to the proclamation of the gospel of salvation in Christ.

Second, all people all over the world throughout history benefit from the grace of God and the redemptive work of Christ, whether they are Christians or not. In 1 Timothy 4:10, the living God is said to be “the Savior of all men, especially of believers. He causes His sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous” (Matt. 5:45).

Third, that the catholic church has boundaries is evident from the New Testament. After excommunicating the impenitently wicked member from the Corinthian church, Paul instructs the rest of the church not to eat with him until he is restored (1 Cor. 5:11). Paul clarifies that he is not calling the church to total isolation from the
unbelieving world, but to the consistent application of excommunication to a “so-called brother” (vs. 11)...To speak of some people being “outside” the church and others as being “within” the church is to speak of a boundary line.

The question is: what is the boundary of the visible catholic church? Answer: a credible profession of faith in the Christian religion.

Fourth, the spatial boundaries of the church are always moving outward, as the church is enlarged and extended by the proclamation of the Word of God in the conversion of sinners: “And the Lord was adding to their number day by day those who were being saved” (Acts 2:47).

Fifth, those inside the church must never lose sight of those who are on the outside. Their proclamation of the gospel and compassionate service does not halt at the boundary line. Outsiders may become insiders by faith in Christ and the credible profession of that faith.

Therefore, sixth, be careful in “judging” who is on the outside. Do not demand something other or more than Christ demanded.

...we must be careful about developing an unduly and improper narrowness and exclusiveness regarding our assessment of members of the catholic church.

How may we be properly narrow while avoiding the sin of improper narrowness and the condemnation of Jesus? (1) Believe that the victory of Christ’s kingdom is not dependent upon us. (2) Believe in the absolute sovereignty of God in revealing His truth to His people. (3) Be willing to have as much fellowship as possible with all Bible-believing Christians and be willing to give a cup to one of these “little ones.” (4) Be willing to learn God’s truth from wherever and whomever He reveals it. (5) Do not ever compromise any part of the Word of God for any reason whatever. (6) Wherever you and another Christian can agree praise God for it, enjoy it and look for other areas of agreement, based on the Word of God.

(501-507)
He concludes:
Therefore, if the church is to experience a continuing reformation by the Word and Spirit of God, and thus be truly catholic, she must repent and learn (and practice) the meaning of these five words: “control, continuity, concern, contrition and commitment.”279
If the church is to be truly catholic and truly reformed, she must be CONTROLLED by no one else but by Jesus Christ, who governs her by His Word. She must derive her strength and life from the divine CONTINUITY of Christ’s redeeming work, submitting herself to His constant judgment and mercy. She must make discipling all the world’s nations to Christ her basic CONCERN. Because of all her sins and shortcomings, she must live in constant CONTRITION. And, finally, if the church is to be truly catholic, she must, in continual repentance of sin, be driven to ever new COMMITMENTS to Christ, His church and His world. 279. Vassady, The Church: Evangelical, Catholic and Reformed, 33. (508) 

Leaving a church for any of the following reasons is schism, and therefore sinful: (1) Personal offenses because of the misconduct of individual members; (2) Wrong decisions by the elders or leaders that are of no lasting injury to the church; (3) Differences of opinion among the members of the church about issues that cannot
be determined by the Word of God and not contained in the doctrinal confession of the church; (4) Difference of opinion regarding “circumstances” of worship and church government; (5) Errors in the teaching of some teachers in the church that are infrequent and not openly approved by the authorities in the church; (6) Relaxed discipline in admitting improper people into the communion of the church; (7) Relaxed discipline in not consistently disciplining and censuring those who are guilty of scandals in the church, “provided the ordinances themselves are retained in purity, the rules of discipline not being set aside”; (8) Irregularities or abuses of different kinds in a church which beg for reformation. (508-509)
From here we take a brief look at the membership of the visible church.
The membership of the visible church in the Old Testament and the New Testament is comprised of all those who profess the true religion, and of their children.  (511)

The one requirement for membership in the visible church is a credible profession of faith in Christ and the true religion of the Bible by all those who are not incapable of making such a profession, viz. infants and mentally impaired or retarded children of believers. Such a profession of faith makes a person, together with his entire
household, members of the visible church, which is God’s covenant community. (512)

"Credible Profession" 
A true profession of faith is a credible, intelligent and consistent profession of
faith. As Larger Catechism Q. 166 states we are to profess our faith in Christ AND obedience to Him. So then, to profess faith in Christ necessarily includes a  profession of obedience to Him, i.e., a vowing “to yield an external subjection to all the ordinances and institutions of Christ [revealed in the Bible].” 287 James Fisher, The Westminster Shorter Catechism Explained (Philadelphia, PA: Presbyterian Board of Publication and Sabbath-School Work [1753] 1911), 193. (514)

Therefore, a credible profession of faith in Christ is credible because: (1) The profession is knowledgeable; (2) It is accurate, i.e., in accord with the Bible; and (3) A correspondence exists between profession and life, i.e., it includes a commitment to obedience to God. (515)

Who has the God-given responsibility to determine the credibility of the profession of faith of those intending to become members of the visible church? It is to the governing officers of the church, who are the guardians of the membership of the church, responsible for the administration of the government and discipline of the church, that Christ has given “the keys of the kingdom” (Matt. 16:19). (515)

First, Peter was the first of the apostles to use the keys. He used the key of Biblical doctrine on the Day of Pentecost in a great Christian Sermon. Later in the home of Cornelius, he used the key of discipline by the Bible when he pronounced the sentence of exclusion from the church on Simon the sorcerer.
Second, “the keys of the kingdom” by which the doors of the church are shut and bound by chain and lock, and opened when the chain is loosed, is a figurative form of expressing authority to admit to the membership of the church and to exclude from that membership. ...
Third, this power to chain the church door forbidding admittance to the impenitent and to loose the chain to admit the believing was not given to Peter alone. ...
Only those may rule in the church now and use the keys of the kingdom and “bind” and “loose,” who have been appointed by the apostles of Christ to do so; and so, as we have seen, those men (that class of officers) are called in the New Testament, presbyters, pastors, elders, bishops, ministers of the word. (515-516)


Profession of the True Religion

Larger Catechism Q. 62 states that church membership is comprised of those who profess the true religion, along with their children; and Question 166 explains that baptism should be administered to those who profess their faith in Christ, and obedience to Him, along with their children....So that, to the Westminster fathers, to profess the true religion is to profess their faith in Christ and is to profess the true reformed religion. Therefore to profess faith in Christ publicly, is to profess that, believing Him to be the incarnate Son of God and only Savior of sinners, we rest upon Him alone for salvation; and that we believe in the whole system of doctrine of Christianity revealed in the Bible. (517)

By the true religion the Catechism means “the whole of those doctrines deduced from the holy scriptures, which are contained in our Confession of Faith, and Catechisms, [hence, the true reformed religion], as agreeing, in the main, with the Confessions of other reformed churches, 2 Tim. 1:13: ‘Hold fast the form of sound
words.’” 293 Fisher, The Westminster Shorter Catechism Explained, 194.  (517)


And Their Children

Because, as we have seen, God has only one church extending from the beginning to the end of time, its membership remains the same in both the Old Testament and the New Testament: those who profess the true religion and their children. If the children of believers were members of the church in the Old Testament, and if
the church is one under both testaments, then they are members of the church now. (519)
Here we close until next week. Maybe I will finish the chapter then!

      Racheal

0 Comments

Reformation Day Faire 2014

10/20/2014

1 Comment

 
Oh and where to begin??? What a glorious, joyful weekend!

I suppose, for the sake of coherence, I probably ought to start on Friday and the trip over to Illinois. It was, thankfully, uneventful and we did not arrive late, even though we got out a little later than we intended. One of the first things I noticed was that Providence Church did not have the usual castle wall facade up...things seemed to be a little more loosely organized in general this year, but it really didn't detract from the lectures and fellowship, so I am not complaining. :)

Unfortunately, we did not get very many pictures, so I haven't any pictures to show you of our dear S's. They were already in Illinois visiting family and came to RefDay for Friday and half of Saturday. They came on over here Saturday afternoon  and just left this morning, taking my elder sister with them...but I'm getting ahead of myself.

I was standing in a doorway talking with my 'brother' Andrew H. when I spotted the S's. I rather unceremoniously blurted, "Oh!" or something like that and left off in the middle of a sentence to dash the fifteen feet to where they were sitting. I'm afraid I was really quite rude and I must apologize for it.  

However, minutes later, I grabbed Andrew by the elbow and propelled him over to meet the S's...and then R and L...I think, were roped into the group to meet them. There was so much talk and laughter and joy that I cannot remember everything that happened...or what order it happened in.

Friday there were three lectures. Two by Phil Kyser and one by Douglas Bond. The topic of this years Reformation Day was the Huguenots--of whom I knew practically nothing. Dr. Kyser first spoke in a general overview sort of way about the theology and orthopraxy of the Huguenots. One could say that they were the "Christian Reconstructionists" of their day; with the same kinds of total-life view of the application of Scripture. (By the way, I do classify myself among the 'Reconstructionists'...there is of course, some variation within that categorization because of human nature.)

Dr. Kyser's second talk (after Mr. Bond's) landed right down my alley--the Huguenot just war theory. He referenced a book "Vindiciae Contra Tyrannus" (or something like that) by a Frenchman named Mornet (I believe; and it's probably not spelled correctly) that I put on my "must-read" list. I agreed...and I nodded...and I took notes...and I grinned...suffice to say, I thoroughly enjoyed that talk.

Douglas Bond's three talks (one on Friday, two on Saturday) were really rather like one, just split into three parts, in which he told stories about different persons and event that took place during the Reformation in France: he spoke of Calvin, Verit, the queen of Navarre, Renee of France, Gaspard Coliny, and others. (There is a bit of story that goes with that, but I'll get there in the chronology.) Anyway, Mr. Bond is an engaging speaking, though, rather like Bill Potter (also a story-teller) not someone I am able to take notes from--so I didn't; I just listened. 

Friday evening, the Josties did the concert. I enjoyed it more than I expected too. For some reason, I assumed that they did gospel music--and a lot of gospel is rather well...not my cup of tea (partly because of the theology of the words and partly because of the way people sing.) I was pleased to hear that they actually know how to sing. (Sound like a snob, don't I?) 

Saturday is always the most particularly exciting day...we girls got up and got decked out in our outfits:
Picture
(I chose to use this picture because she has something of a period pose.)
Picture
I was trying to open the window to see if how cold it was...I'll put more pictures lower down.
Picture
Ain't she purdy??
We had a little time to spare, so we goofed around a little...the above mentioned attempt at opening the window was part of that. Turns out, I had actually locked it when I was trying to unlock it. (In other words, I did get it open eventually.) Katherine thought I looked so funny tugging on the window that she had to get some pictures...and they did come out funny, so I thought I'd share them for your amusement.
Picture
The idgit had yet to figure out that the window was locked, not just stuck!
Picture
One disadvantage to being short is that you sometimes can't reach things with ease (the upper window lock in this case).
Picture
Finally! I got it...and determined that yes, indeed, I was going to need my woolen sleeves.
We got to the church a little early, so took a brief reconnaissance drive around to locate the school were the dance was going to be that evening. (I knew where it was, but we thought we'd familiarize ourselves with the route.)

Well, we got back, pulled into the parking lot, and parked next to a silver car with an NRA and AOPA sticker on it. We made a few remarks about it...(NRA's a good thing!) without knowing who it belonged too--turns out as we found out that afternoon, it belonged to none other than our adopted brothers R!! It was hilarious that we unintentionally parked right next to them!

So, we go into the building, not knowing the R's were there yet, trot up the steps and who do I see across the foyer but Caleb! In a matter of minutes, three sisters and three brothers were greeting each other and talking 90 miles an hour, across this little circle. The S's arrived and were dragged into the circle by yours truly. I don't know exactly whose idea it was to sit together, but we ended up in a single row like this: Andy, Caleb, Katherine, Racheal, Savannah, and Dan. The S's were in the row ahead of us since we all wouldn't fit in one row.

My fingers went nearly ceaselessly during the three talks that took place that morning (Rev. McDonald's impression this year was of Gaspard Coliny's elder brother--the name I forget) and I got the entire cuff of Andy's second kilt sock finished! Yay! (I finished the first sock Friday on the way over.) Toward evening, I had Andy try on the completed sock and it fit perfectly! He seemed to really like it...and it appeared to me that he didn't want to take it off! I am going to make him and Dan both a set of kilt flashes to go with their kilts/socks. (Dan got himself a kilt...I forgot to ask what tartan it was, but it looked rather like Graham to me and Graham is my primary tartan claim.) I have also been commissioned to knit Dan a pair of kilt hose. :) However, you're not here to read of the Socketeer's business prospects...

Let's see...we were to have a jam session between lunch and the Highland games (about an hour); so we gathered out in the cold wind and the slight sprinkle and waited....and waited...and waited while the poor over-taxed food vendors worked as fast as they could to feed the line of people. Both Dan and Caleb had already eaten by the time Savannah, Katherine, Andy, and I had gotten our food. (The H's would have already eaten, I guess, because their last name falls in the first half of the alphabet and we were assigned to eat according to last names.) Once we ate, we went in and jammed. As promised, Andy helped me on 'General Taylor' both during the jam session and later as we headed toward the Highland Games. (As of this afternoon, I'm doing terrible on it; but I do know what it is that I need to work on.) I still can't keep up with Andy's flying fingers, but I did a little better this year because I am in practice better than last year. I don't know exactly what it is, but my guitar's tone doesn't seem to blend overly well with his...even though I was in tune.

We actually did a few of songs that we girls are proficient at--including "Hallelujah, Praise Jehovah"--which our brothers informed us was much too fast. Ha! ;) It's not a dirge, you guys! ;D (It was actually rather humorous, the banter about that...) 

But we did 'Salley Gardens', one of my favorites (me finger-picking to boot!)...'Be Thou My Vision'...oh boy...I can't remember the rest, but it sure was fun. Strumming, bowing, percussion, whistles, voices...I look forward to the next jam session. :) (Maybe I ought to practice a little harder too!) 

We moved on to the Highland Games with little ol' me trying to match my  voice to Andy's and conquer General Taylor; by the time we got there, Andy told me he thought I had it...well, sorta, Andy...sorta. :)

Caleb did not win the cabor toss this year; I think he came in second (or third at the least)...and someplace along in there in the rock toss. I went and bugged Andrew about getting in on the 'funn' but he didn't because he had a shoulder bugging him. I agree, it's not a good idea to stress already bothersome joints/muscles. I stayed over there instead of wandering back to where Savannah and Katherine were because I could see better (the announcer) had stepped in front of us three and I got busy hollering for all my "brothers" (the H's, the R's, and the B's). I figured I might as well get into it and have fun. 

Christopher, Thomas, William, and Joshua B. were being noisy in a different fashion and I vainly tried to get them to slacken their "war chant". Andy told me to ignore them and they'd quit--but they wouldn't have. I know those guys...they are so much themselves (which sounds weird).  I heaved Christopher up at one point and he was squawking, "Put me down!" with a huge grin in his voice...and so I kept ahold of him until he asked sweetly if I would, "Put me down...please." What? PLEASE? From the Lion-hearted?? Yes, dear...

I grabbed William around the shoulders at one point too...I forget what it was about...but he really doesn't mind the affection. (Those boys know that I love 'em--because I've told them so.) Thomas doesn't stick around as long for hugs. :D I'm doing good with Joshua just to ruffle his hair--he's never been as receptive to it anyway (he likes Katherine best of us three girls).

Daniel B. did the cabor toss for the second time this year. He's such a scrawny looking young man, though tall enough, that the he doesn't look like he could handle it well, but he did pretty decently. Give him a couple more years and he may be giving the standing camps (Caleb and a feller named Matt [who plays a pretty mean piano, too!]) a run for their money. (Daniel doesn't talk to me much these days [he's 16 and too into football after church to want to stand around and exchange pleasantries with me], but we're still family, as his coming up Saturday evening to let us know his 'battle wounds' were not hurting anymore, showed. I'm pretty fond of that tall, skinny, blue-eyed kid.)

Let's see...there were all kinds of humorous little situations, from one guy taking a head-first dive into the dirt right after his rock went flying, to joking about the Canadian running around in shorts and shortsleeves while everyone else was dressed a little heavier; even the guys in kilts had on more clothing with long sleeves and all.

I did it...I really did. Whether or not I should be embarrassed about it is another question. I gave my last year's critique of Andy's sword play to him--and like a gentleman he listened to me...and even took it. I could see that he was defending himself a little tighter. In other words, he stayed in the fight a little longer! I mean, literally, there were a couple of times that I wanted to snatch a fallen boffer and chase some dude off from Andy last year. :D I do so enjoy a good bout of sword-play that it can be hard to "just watch" the boffer wars. The three R's fought shoulder to shoulder...and at one point, some guys in front of me encouraged themselves, "Let's get the Canadians!" and promptly descended upon the three of them. I was thinking: "But they're not Canadian!" Oh, well...odd.

Let's see...I don't want to bore my readership with flash-tidbits of moments that either amused me or had significance to me...but would be "blah" to you all...so I'll just sum up the Games in this way: I had much fun watching them, talking to Andrew and Andy, teasing the B kiddos, yelling in support of my friends, laughing, and looking "goofy" (according to KT) with my shawl tucked on top of my head. After a while, I got cold and along with that, both my 'Lymie' wrist and hip started to ache a little, so when Savannah, Caleb, Katherine, and Andrew headed in, I went with them.

Shortly after that, the other two R brothers came back from the wars. Andy with beat up hands (not good for a professional musician); he held his hands up to show me his swollen knuckles and his hands were still quivering. Dan had a goose-egg on his right wrist, though I didn't know that until we were dancing the Virginia Reel and he had to quit clapping because it was bothering him. (I stamped my foot so hard I make my knee hurt during that dance. :D)

The discussion of "where are we going to go eat supper" started in earnest. No one wanted to see me out of sorts from food (me most especially!) and so we settled on a Bob Evans some 10-15 minutes away. The R's led the way in their car and I moved to the backseat to allow Andrew the use of the front seat (afterall, his legs are twice as long as mine!) and thusly we went, "Won't Caleb drive a little faster? I'm hungry!!" :D Turns out, he was driving so slowly because he thought Savannah was an overly cautious driver. (I.e. a duffer--like me.) Anyway, so we got to Bob Evans and I laughed something about only Caleb and Andy be the normal looking people amongst the seven of us, for Dan was kilted and Andrew was decked out in early 1800's styled finery, not to mention the medieval/Reformation style outfits of the ladies of the party! I really didn't feel as awkward as I thought I was going to. Some lady in the restroom asked me if we were with 'the show' (apparently there was some sort of Broadway-esque show playing in Peoria)...

After we were seated, I cornered Dan to get some information concerning the voice over he is supposed to be doing for me and as soon as I said "Voice Over" he got this look on his face that really cracked me up. I swallowed his excuses (I have less excuse than he does for not being any further along than I am!) and proceeded to order my salmon. There was lively conversation and plenty of laughs over our supper. I'm afraid I looked askance at the blueberry pancakes that ended up in front of Dan...I could just imagine eating that and being so sick I couldn't walk straight. :D It was even more fun though to tell Andy "Eat!" every two minutes...he really only glared good-naturedly at me once. (We had a time limit because the ball started at 7:30.)

Well, we made it (and many thanks to Dan for picking up the tab for the entire table!) and were there and ready when the dancing started. Mrs. B called this year and I think did a pretty good job for her second full ball. I was pleased as punch when Christopher strolled up and proffered his hand to me. I don't recall the little stinker ever asking me to dance before...that was the Waves of Tory...so we had short me and even shorter Christopher--but we managed the arches without over much trouble. :)

As previously mentioned, I did the Virginia Reel with Dan, whose arm was hurting him. He kept clapping, then stopping, and then starting again. It's odd how somethings just "happen" even though you know it would be better if you quit doing whatever it is. (I've done that while playing spoons before; the blisters start coming and I just keep playing.) It's practically impossible not to clap during the Virginia Reel!!

The Virginia Reel and the Gay Gordon (or Carolina Promenade, depending on who you are talking to) are my favorite dances and both were done. I started that one (it's a mixer) with Andy...likewise the Pattycake Polka (and of course, I had to mention how 7 lb.s of Bacon does it...and he quipped something about 7 lb.s of bacon sound good. Goofy! ;P) 

I think nearly all the dances were ones I had done before...since I am learning the ECD terms and steps, I'm getting to a point where I can just pick up and go with a dance after a real quick walk through. Remembering the names and which is which is the hard part! I love to dance! 

It was roundly agreed amongst ourselves that we could have kept dancing much past 10...but since we had to be out of the building by a certain time, we had to quit. I was sooo wound up that night that I didn't conk out very fast and then I woke up early. 

We wiled away the time before it was time to go to church by packing and loading the car. Oh, and 'peep ob-ing'. ;) Looking out our window, we could see the parking lot of the neighboring hotel--even from that distance, I recognized members of the J family (whom I don't actually know, but I know who they are). Minutes before we left, I spotted two heads bobbing along...as soon as they appeared from behind a tree, I knew who they were. Of course, the guitar case really helped, but I knew it was Andy and Dan without it. :D

The sermon was edifying and interesting as Rev. McDonald spoke on verses 9-22 of II Timothy 4 (the end of the book). He was noting how this was, in a way, rather like Paul's last will and testament and how he was thinking about people, not possessions or position, as he neared the end of his life.

I find that communion is a bit on the awkward side at Providence, but I appreciate being able to take it all the same. And that church sings. Not just robustly, but in parts. You can hear the sopranos, the basses, the tenors, and probably the altos if you're really listening (we tend to get lost, I think, between the sopranos and tenors). It is just a joy to sing at Providence because it is so beautiful. 

The church kindly provided people lunch on Sunday afternoon. I went downstairs with my sisters and Andy, but, because I offered to take Bibles and jackets upstairs, I ended up going through the line with Caleb and Dan (rather than cutting back in, I just joined the end of the line). Dan filled up a tray again this year, but not as much as last year...and once again, he ate practically all of it. :D I was full after a single plateful.

During lunch (like last year) Savannah and Andy talked non-stop. Caleb interjected into whichever conversation he wanted to, and Dan and I probably spent more time talking about guns than anything else. :D Katherine was quiet for the most part and just ate while listening intently to Savannah and Andy; until R came over and slipped in between KT and I...there was some joking about me having enough room...which I assured her I had enough room and we'd know that I didn't when I fell off the end of the bench and hit my head on the brick wall beside me. ;)

Before we left, we spent roughly another hour doing a hymn-sing in the sanctuary. Seth, someone I know who they are because of filmmaking, accompanied us on the piano. We concluded with "God Be With You Til We Meet Again" (which I did not know)...and it was so beautiful, I was beginning to choke up!

Then, seriously right before we left, we had a little photoshoot where Katherine got to use the timer on her camera. Here's the results:
Picture
Picture
It's really funny...because if you are scrolling through the pictures, we look like we're all swaying if you flip between them. :D (Obviously, we did not stand in age order, or height order or in any usual sense of photographic orderliness. We just lined up like siblings and waited for Katherine to dash back to the group.)

And just one final picture...Andy, waiting for his brothers to return so they could start home:
Picture
It was a grand weekend...and I look forward to seeing all the friends mentioned in this post "the next time" whenever that rolls around!

God Bless Y'all! It's a joy knowing you!

      Racheal

1 Comment

The Makings of a 1500's  Peasant Outfit

10/15/2014

1 Comment

 
Right. So this outfit started out as Flemish...but it really looks more English:
Picture
Flemish
Picture
English
I guess, since I really look much more English, that is fine. :) The main difference between the styles, from a cursory glance, is the width of the lacing.

Alright...to the details now!

I bought the red wool I used last year, intending on making this outfit then, but what with one thing and another, I didn't...and I ended up with my long, too big, mustard yellow kirtle instead.
Picture
By the end of the day, I had managed to rip roughly half the hem out. But anyway, that is not of too much consequence for this tale, excepting that the kirtle is part of it.

I'll take you through the construction of this Flemish/English dress from the kirtle out (mostly). One of the first things I did was take up the kirtle. It was too big on me last year and I have gotten a little thinner since then, so it really looked like a sack of potatoes on me. In addition to that, in my research, I read that the kirtle was a tight garment, laced up the back. Well, mine laces up the side, so that didn't get altered, but I did sew up the front and back princess seams, as well as the center back. It's still not super tight (which is fine), but it doesn't leave me feeling like a slob either.

It was decided, that due to my stature (short, you know) and my personality, a shorter skirt would be fitting. The Flemish peasants wore their gowns anywhere from mid-calf to floor length. Well, I know what happens with me and floor length stuff. :D So the next step was hemming the kirtle up about 8 inches (or more). (By the way, this stuff isn't necessarily in chronological order; more in logical order.)

Ah...now we're getting to the pictures! I don't have any kirtle-in-process-of-alteration pictures, but I do have the actual "dress"...though it's more of jumper. I don't know exactly what to call my red-wool contraption, but anyway.

Savannah helped guide me onto the right pattern, which she then fitted on me. Believe it or not, it was the same pattern I used to make one of my '40's dresses in the spring!
Picture
A piece of paper was added in the back to bring the neck-line up to match that of the kirtle.
I made a mock up out of brown felt first...
Picture
I didn't line the bodice mock up.
Picture
It fit perfectly, but due to where the lines fell, it was determined to move the front edges closer together--thus really morphing it into the English style. With this determined, I laid the pattern out on the wool and ran into a problem. I didn't have enough to line the whole bodice in matching fabric!

After conferring with my adviser (Savannah), I decided to rip apart my mock up and use the back piece for the lining. As the felt and wool stretch similarly, it worked pretty nicely. This way if the lining gets exposed at the front, it won't be noticeable since it's the same color as the outer layer.

Picture
(I am aware that the ironing board cover is in bad shape.)
And then came the really interesting part...what to use for the metal loops the lacing was to go through? Mama found some coat hook and eyes at Jo-Ann's. The eyes worked perfectly!
Picture
Markings for the lacing loops...
Picture
The eyes...
By the way, the use of metal loops is authentic. In the past, we have always just done eyelets in things like this, but with the research that I did, this is much more authentic--at least for this time period.
Picture
I stitched the eyes in by hand before I took them to the machine. There is no way that I was going to even TRY it without the prior stitching. Additionally, this gave them more strength and "holding power".
Picture
Not quite done with this yet...but you'll see. :)
Picture
The next step was closing the shoulders. Savannah showed me how to do it. I have done something similar before, but I needed the reminder. 

Once this was done, it was time to move on to the skirt and the sleeves. The skirt was really straight forward. Savannah measured it, I chopped roughly 8 inches off the bottom of both skirt panels (outside and lining), stitched them together, turned them right side out, and ironed them. Then, I slid into the bodice and Savannah roughed in four inverted box pleats. After that, I took the whole to the ironing board and finalized the pleat placement. As is not unusual for me, I sewed the waist seam twice. Mama used to do that to all the clothes she made me as a little girl. Kept me from ripping the skirts off so easily. Anyway, she taught me the trick when she taught me how to sew.

I pinned the lining over the waist seam...and all the way around the front opening.

Then, I addressed myself to the sleeves. Plain and simple, the sleeves are the scraps from the bottom of the skirt panels. I had four pieces, so I stitched them together to form two tubes.

Picture
After that, I slid them on my arms and had a problem. I was not going to be able to pin them up at the shoulders like I was supposed to--so Savannah came to the rescue.
Picture
We basically cut a big notch into one side (the under arm)...
In the end, they looked something like this:
Picture
I took this picture myself--that is why it is blurry. Anyway, I hand stitched the top. Savannah thought I had put a band on it at first!
Picture
The sleeves are really long. If I roll them down they come down well over my hands. However, once again, if you look at the pictures, they appeared to be long like that and the women just rolled them up (or completely removed them) depending on the weather and what they were doing.
In addition to hand top-stitching the sleeve tops, I did the entire front opening of the outer-dress. I was just going to do the bodice at first (for the main reason of securing the lacing loops better), but it was determined that it would look better if I did the whole thing. So I did.
Picture
I think, for not having a huge amount of (visible) hand-stitching practice, that it looks pretty decent.
Now, before we get to the pictures of the completed ensemble, I'd like to show you one other piece that I made in a single morning (yesterday). I have wanted one of these "things" for several years now (probably could even use it with my WBtS outfits) and so I determined to stick to ol' chin out there and do it. 

Yes, I am talking about a pocket. 

I roughed out a pattern on a piece of scrap paper, cut that out, did a little measuring...and el-bam-o! It actually looked like it was going to work!
Picture
Well, I wanted a wee bit of decoration on said pocket--but I know diddly-squat about actual embroidery (cross-stitch doesn't exactly count) and when I tried I decided that under the circumstances, it wasn't going to be worth the effort. But as I told Mama, "I know how to do straight stitches and French knots!" So I did.
Picture
Take that, non-decorated pocket!
I didn't have time to do anything fancy, like these (from 1796, I believe the stitching says, but hardly a new concept at the time), so I contented myself with the somewhat wiggly geometric design around the slit opening.
Picture
I had yet to do it when this photo was taken, but I put a button on to close it the waist band.
I did a wee bit more research, looking for whether or not these ladies wore leather belts and specifically, belts with buckles. I found a few, but all of them still had long tails that hung down to the knees. Now, I don't have any belts quite that long in my collection, nor even soft enough to tie the way the did them...so I am borrowing Daddy work belt. It's not quite long enough either, but it is soft enough.  (You do know I'm rather addicted to my belts, right?)

Alright, so with that said, how about some pictures of the finished outfit? (I would still like someone to give me a good explanation as to why photographs make one look wider than one does in the mirror...)
Picture
Full front view.
Picture
Full back view. (No, I will not wear my hair in the plastic clips.)
Picture
(If I look glassy-eyed, it was because I hadn't eaten supper yet.) The sleeves literally just get pinned with straight pins to the shoulder straps.
Picture
And here is an alternate version of how the ladies wore their skirts; rather than pinning it though I was able to just tuck it into my belt. I rather liked the way this looked/felt, but Mama thought it looked silly...and Katherine pronounced that I had my rooster's tail. :D
Well, that's it. I will probably wear those shoes (and please don't laugh too hard when I fall off them outdoors) since they are the closest looking thing I have to "authentic" shoes. I will not be bare-legged either...I have this lovely pair of brown angora wool knee-socks Mama bought me last year that I intend on wearing. I would have worn my home-made ones, but trotting around in just one sock would probably cause me to be of more amusement than I'd really like to be. ;)

I am SO looking forward to this weekend's adventures!

      Racheal

1 Comment

The Church of Christ, Part 3

10/12/2014

0 Comments

 
I do believe we left off last week, just having concluded the fifth office of the church, that of Elder. We pick up then with the office of Deacon.
The sixth office, that of deacon, is essential to the health of the church—physically, spiritually, and socially—for another reason. It is “the office of love” in the church. His [the deacon's] concern is love in that it shows Christians how to love one another practically and effectively. (443-444)

As the word, “oversight,” summarizes the work of the elder, so the word “service” summarizes the work of the deacon. It is a physical, material and social work in that it is concerned with the relief of physical, material and social needs in the congregation.
Because of the spiritual, serving, caring nature of the office of deacon, his serving ministry draws a sharp line between the church and the world....The church dispenses the mercy of Christ to Christ’s people and to the world Christ made....Significantly, the Bible tells us that of the seven deacons chosen by the church in Jerusalem, Stephen and Philip were active also as evangelists. 
The office of deacon is rooted in the sympathy for the poor and needy that characterized the covenant community of the Old Testament: “You shall freely open your hand to your brother, to your needy and poor in your land” (Deut. 15:11)...The apostolic church took seriously its responsibility to care for the needy. It systematically cared for its widows (1 Tim. 5:3f) and frequently received offerings for its needy members (2 Cor. 8–9). It believed that “pure and undefiled religion in the sight of our God and Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their distress, and to keep oneself unstained by the world” (James 1:27). (444)

The function of the deacon is to manage the financial affairs of the church, especially with reference to the collections and distributions of the churches monies and properties to the needy.
Deacons must be men of piety, sound judgment, prudence, knowledge of the Word and world, and weight of character. (446)

The Bible does not assign to deacons any role in the government of the church. The responsibility is in the hands of the ruling elders. Therefore, although they may be invited to Session meetings, they have no vote as the rulers of the church. (447)

Deacons serve Christ when they serve the church. And the service they give involves the giving of food and drink, extending shelter, providing clothes, visiting the sick, loaning or giving money to the needy, giving work to the needy, expressing sympathy and compassion in observable and practical ways, like being present in times of crisis or giving financial advice if needed. (448)

"[T]he deacons must also care for the souls of their poor, for they are as fathers to them; and whatever one member is obligated to do to another, they must excel in doing to those over whom the Lord has placed them. (1). They must instruct the ignorant, and bring them to the church services and to catechism instruction. (2). They must exhort, rebuke, and comfort according to individual circumstances. (3). They must visit the sick, either preparing their souls for the hour of death, or exhorting them to increase in godliness if they may again become healthy. In doing so they will “purchase to themselves a good degree, and great boldness in the faith
which is in Christ Jesus” (1 Tim. 3:13)." 205 Brakel, The Christian’s Reasonable Service, 2:151–52. (449)
As with Elders, there are both positive and negative requirements (found on pages 450-451). The positive requirements are that deacons should be a) men of dignity, b) of a clear conscience, c) beyond reproach, d) the husband of one wife, and e) a good manager of household/children. The negative requirements are that he should not be a) double-tongued, b) addicted to wine, and c) not fond of sordid gain.

From all this above we can conclude:
First, the greatest Deacon who ever lived, upon whom our lives and salvation depends is the Lord Jesus Christ. His deaconing work in our behalf is the basis for the forgiveness of our sins and our acceptance in the family of God. (453)
 
Second, those who hold the office of deacon are not the only ones who are to do the work of a “deacon.” All Christians are called to the “work of service” (διακονιασ) (Eph. 4:12). All Christians are to be servants and ministers of God to each other, deaconing to each other in the name of Christ. (456)

Third, Isaiah 58:5–12 teaches us that service is power. This text presents us with three fundamental truths: (1) true repentance is characterized by concrete and practical service to those in need; (2) Christian service is the giving of ourselves to people in need; and (3) God promises that Christian service will have great effects. (457)
The seventh office is that of "Teacher". (Personally, I found this one interesting because I had never considered it before.)
Seventh, according to The Westminster Form of Presbyterial Church-Government, the New Testament church had the office of teacher (“doctor”) (1 Cor. 12:28; Eph. 4:11): “And He gave some as apostles, and some as prophets, and some as evangelists, and some as pastors and teachers.” He, as a minister of the word, as well as the pastor, has the authority to administer the sacraments. (459)

"Pastors and Teachers are supposed by some to denote one office, because the apostle does not, as in the other parts of the verse, say, “and some, pastors; and some, teachers;”… but and some, pastors and teachers.… I partly agree with them,
that Paul speaks indiscriminately of pastors and teachers as belonging to one and the same class, and that the name teacher does, to some extent, apply to all pastors. But this does not appear to me a sufficient reason why two offices, which I find to differ from each other, should be confounded. Teaching is, no doubt, the duty of all pastors; but to maintain sound doctrine requires a talent for interpreting 
Scripture, and a man may be a teacher who is not qualified to preach. Pastors, in my opinion, are those who have the charge of a particular flock; though I have no objection to their receiving the name of teachers, if it be understood that there is a distinct class of teachers, who preside both in the education of pastors and in the instruction of the whole church. It may sometimes happen, that the same person is
both a pastor and a teacher, but the duties to be performed are entirely different." 221 John Calvin, Commentaries on the Epistles of Paul to the Galatians and Ephesians, trans. by Rev. William Pringle, 21:279. (459-460)
(I could not find a way to trim that without cutting the logical flow up.)

The final office of the church is that of Evangelist.
Eighth, the office of evangelist was an office in the New Testament church (Eph. 4:11, 12; Acts 21:8; 2 Tim. 4:5). The evangelist
"differed from the apostles and prophets in that, so far as we are informed, he did not possess the same extraordinary or higher charisms [miraculous gifts of the Spirit]; he differed from the pastors and presbyters, that he was not tied down to any particular district. He was simply an itinerating minister, whose duty was to preach the gospel to any who knew it not, and to organize a church in any locality where the material existed and opportunity offered. Having placed the new society [congregation] under officers of its own, he passed on to other districts and provinces where similar work had to be done. The evangelist of the apostolic age is the missionary, whose work was [and is] twofold:—the preaching of the gospel [to the lost] and the organization of churches [out of converts to his preaching].… The evangelist is a pioneer, opening up the way for the church and ministry." 222 Witherow, The Form of the Christian Temple, 38–9. (460-461)
From here we move on into the nature and extent of church authority, or said another way, the jurisdiction of church courts. 

First then, what is the source of the church authority and jurisdiction?
The authority of the church comes directly from God, “being exercised and enforced, not only or chiefly because of the permission or consent of its members,
but because it is a positive Divine institution, apart altogether from that consent.… In other words, the source of church power is not in the members, but in Christ [Matt. 28:18].” 226 Bannerman, The Church of Christ, 1:191–92. (462-463)
What is the standard of church authority and jurisdiction?
The standard defining the nature and extent of church authority is the entire Word of God written—sola scriptura—not the laws of the state, the civil constitution of a nation, nor the will of the members or officers. (463)
What is the nature of church authority and jurisdiction? It is multi-faceted, the first angle being ministerial.
The authority of church officers and church courts is subordinate to Christ and His Word, and is, therefore, ministerial,
"having no authority or discretion of their own, and being merely ministers or servants to carry out the will and execute the appointments of Christ.… In reference to the office-bearers of the Church, of whatsoever place or authority in it, they, if they keep within their office, are but the instruments in the hands of Christ Himself, acting in His name, ruling by His authority, and carrying into effect no more than His instructions." 229 Bannerman, The Church of Christ, 1:219. (464)
The second facet is itself multi-faceted:
Second, God’s authority is directly related to the exercise of church authority and the decisions of church courts. (464)

Jesus Christ, as Head and King of His church, has given church courts a threefold authority: authority in matters of doctrine; authority in matters of worship; and authority in matters of discipline. (465)

Therefore, first, doctrine:
As the pillar, guardian and custodian of the revealed truth of God, the church
is to be a witness, interpreter and defender of Biblical truth to the consciences, minds, hearts and lives of people, both inside and outside the church. (465)

The church is the official custodian and teacher of the Word of God to those within her membership (1 Tim. 3:15; Matt. 28:19–20; 2 Tim. 2:2). The Head of the church has commissioned His church to guard His Word from supplementation, perversion, alteration or abridgement. (465)

The church is also commissioned by Christ to be the authoritative witness to the world on behalf of the truth of the Word of God (Acts 1:8; Phil. 2:15–16). In being Christ’s authoritative witness to the world, she is also to confess her faith solemnly, boldly and clearly in the face of the world’s unbelief and evil (Eph. 5:1f). This responsibility of confessing the truth of the Word of God to the world has been discharged by the church historically by the framing of summaries of the truth in confessions of faith or catechisms...Such confessions and catechisms, concisely and precisely bearing witness to revealed truth over against falsehood serves a twofold purpose: (1) A witness for the truth; and (2) A protest against false doctrines. (466)
Second, worship:
The church has the authority to put into effect the institutions, ordinances and laws appointed by Christ in His church, which does NOT involve the power to bind the conscience of its members to the observance of new and additional ordinances enacted by itself. (467)

The authority of the church in matters of worship is concerned with the following three points. (1) The church is commissioned to preserve from generation to generation the public worship of God according to the way God Himself has commanded in His Word. (2) The church is to preserve from generation to generation the observance of the Christian Sabbath according to the way God
Himself has commanded for it to be observed in His Word. (3) The church has the responsibility to maintain the office of the minister of the Word from generation to generation... (467)
Third, discipline:
The church has the power to apply church discipline, to admit and to exclude from the fellowship of the church, and to govern the conduct of members while they continue as members. (468)

How is the purity of the church, in its doctrine and life, to be maintained? ...
First of all, church discipline is rooted in self-discipline....
Three means are presented in the Bible whereby a church can preserve and advance its purity of doctrine and practice....(1) The careful admission of people into the church’s membership and to the Lord’s Table by the elders; (2) The practice of loving church discipline in the congregation; and (3) The careful, faithful preaching and teaching of the whole Word of God.  (469-470)
These last are more fully expounded:
The one requirement for church membership is a credible profession of faith in Christ and the Bible (Matt. 16:16–18; Acts 2:41; Matt. 28:19). A credible profession of faith is a profession of faith in Christ and the Bible that is believable, that is in general conformity with the teachings of the Bible and that is demonstrated in a life of obedience to God in the one making the profession. (470)

Elders must exercise great care and vigilance in this area of receiving people into the church, praying that God would give them discernment, courage and wisdom (James 1:5) so as not to expect too little or demand too much from those who would come under their shepherding oversight and join the congregation committed to their charge. (471)

Discipline and discipleship are the same thing. It is the training of a believer to live an increasingly faithful life of devotion to Jesus Christ, glorifying and enjoying God in all he is and does. Christian discipline or discipleship is comprised of three components: instruction, which is preventive discipline, chastisement, which is corrective discipline, and counseling, which is restorative discipline.
Preventive discipline is the exercise of the authority Christ gave His church to instruct and guide its members in the revealed ways of God (Deut. 29:29) and to promote purity and peace in the church (Matt. 16:19). It involves the active, vigorous and consistent preaching and teaching of the Word of God, catechizing, training and instructing the young and old in the true revealed religion....
Restorative discipline is essential to the purity of the church. It is not only to be practiced by the ministers and elders, but by all the members of the church, who, as they are filled with faith, goodness, knowledge and wisdom from the Word, are “competent to counsel” (Rom. 15:13–14). ...
Corrective discipline is needed in the congregation, because all congregations are comprised of believing sinners....When a church member wanders into sinful paths, inadvertently or deliberately, he needs loving correction and restoration, much as an erring child needs correction, even chastisement to learn that the way of the transgressor is hard so that he might be restored. (471-472)

[The latter point is further broken out in the following:]

First, the person who is offended and concerned because of some sin against him from another church member is to approach the offender in love about his sin and the problems arising from it, in an effort to set things straight, and to save the brother from further hurt and shame.
Second, if this fails, he is to take witnesses with him either to witness the offender’s refusal to repent, or to back up the pleas of the offended person that the offender make things right with God and with his brothers and sisters (James 5:19, 20).
Third, if this fails, the matter is to be brought before the rulerrepresentatives
of the church—the Session of elders—to offer a solution through prayer, love, counseling and the searching of the Scriptures. (472)
Fourth, if this fails, and the offender hardens himself in his impenitency, the Session is to excommunicate him from the fellowship of the church, and he is to be treated by the church as apostate and an unbeliever who is outside the warmth and safety of the church, that he might be forced to live by the consequences of his rebellious decision, be brought to his senses and to repentance, that he might be restored to Christ and to His church. The elders also make such a judgment for the sake of the purity of the church that Christ might be glorified and honored by all men. (474)
The following is the objective of church authority:
First, the reception of members. 

Second, the edification of members.

Third, the exclusion of impenitent offenders.

Fourth, the restoration of penitents.


(477-478)
What are the limits of church authority and jurisdiction?
First, church authority is limited in that it is distinctly and exclusively
spiritual authority.

Second, church authority is limited by its Origin, the Lord Jesus Christ, the Head of the church, from whom it is derived. The authority of the office-bearers in the church is subordinate to Christ’s authority and is purely ministerial, not legislative.

Third, church authority is limited by the Standard by which it is to be exercised, i.e., the written Word of God.

Fourth, church authority is limited by the subjects of that authority, that is, it is limited by the privileges and duties of the Christian people themselves. 

(478-479)
What is the relation between church courts and civil courts?
The church, under Christ her King, is an independent domain, even as the state is. The church is a separate institution with its own powers, functions and jurisdiction....Ecclesiastical constitutions have no authority in civil government; and civil constitutions have no authority in ecclesiastical government. To reject this limitation is political, cultural and ecclesiastical suicide....Its government is in the hands of the officers of the church and is distinct from the civil magistrate.
After having said this, it must be reiterated emphatically that this institutional separation of church and state does not imply any antithesis between God and state, Christianity and state, Biblical morality and state, or Bible and state. Religious neutrality in politics is a myth the humanists try to impose on Christians, while they themselves are never neutral. (479)
I drew my reading to a conclusion at the end of this section. I will not be at home next weekend, so we will, Lord willing, renew our study of "The Church of Christ" in two Lord's Day's from this.

     Racheal

0 Comments

And so I Turned Three and Twenty...

10/10/2014

1 Comment

 
I awoke, not unusually, to the dawn bustle of my cats wrestling and leaping (occasionally landing on me). I decided I ought to get up shortly after I heard a crash next to my head and rightly surmised that my bedside flashlight had hit the floor due to the wranglings of an overgrown kitten. (I do believe it was Curio.)

It was raining, which put a damper on the proposed shooting expedition for the day. As it turns out, it was probably better that way because Daddy had a headache all day. I satisfied myself by taking a few minutes in the middle of the afternoon to rack the bolt on my rifle and squint down the barrel. I am trying to learn how to shoot with both eyes open (or mostly open), so I practiced sighting in that fashion. I probably would have landed lead on paper in the process had I actually been firing, but I doubt it would have been overly accurate. 

Instead of exploring the world of guns, powder, explosions, and re-training of eyeballs, I turned to a far more staid pursuit--and didn't get too far into that. I am stitching up a dress (okay, so some folks would call it a "costume") for the Reformation Day event next weekend. Savannah fitted me for the bodice, I cut out and sewed the mock-up...it fit. So I cut out and sewed up the bodice of the actually garment. I ended up taking a little extra out of the arm-holes so I wouldn't be bound under the arms. I am rather picky about stuff being too tight in the arm holes. 

Well, anyway, I did not get the bodice actually finished because I did not have the needed metal loops (we'll call them that for lack of a better name). Mama did get them at Jo-Ann's later in the day when she and Daddy went to town for a new dryer...but I'll get there in a minute. I was going to go ahead and make the skirt, but I forget why I didn't do that. I think I wanted to Savannah to help me and I didn't exactly ask her, for some reason, and instead I did something else...which I cannot remember.

But, back to the dryer. Yesterday the old dryer, which Mama disliked to begin with, died. Stinky electrical smell and all. Today, Daddy decided that they ought to go get a new one. So, they set out sometime after 4 o'clock, shortly after I gave up the idea of making myself a narrower wrist brace. We didn't have any velcro that was wide enough to allow much adjustabilty. 

While they were gone, I went about prepping for the ousting of Dryer the Elder and the establishment of Dryer the Younger. The long and the short of that was that I cleaned the bathroom and the hallway (to a degree) and shoved the old dryer out into the hall. Abby came to "help" and ended up a bit spooked with the dryer shoving...still, she stuck around with her usual curiosity over odd behavior.  

From there I drifted into the garage and widened the path, swept a little, and even beat a few rugs.

When I got done there, I came in, settled down in front of my computer and addresses a business "problem" via a Skype conversation with Savannah. (Yes, we are a little odd like that at times. We live in the same house, but conduct conversations via our fingertips. To be honest though, I didn't actually intend on bothering her very long as I knew she was working on a paper.)

About the same time we'd figured out the solution to the question, she came down to make supper (Mexican salad!), and  Mama and Daddy got home with Dryer the Younger and the necessary items to finish my bodice.

I helped with the removal and installation process of the dryers. I even got to use a driver! ;) 

Supper was tasty and we ate all the food on the table except for some of the beans. The expression on Mama's face was somewhat humorous...though somehow, I don't think it elicited the laughter that this one did!
Picture
That is half of my birthday present from Daddy...
Here's the other half:
Picture
Daddy says: "That's bigger than you are..."
Not sure I will be able to shoot it one handed...or maybe only one shot before switching back to the two-handed grip. :D

Katherine also made sure I got a little something (I really wasn't expecting anything, which would have been fine. I have had so many "big" birthdays over the years that small ones are fine.) She is SO good about birthdays and such, unlike her less fore-thoughtful older sister...
Picture
Both Katherine and I collect Norman Rockwell stuff...so it's not unusual for us to pick something up at the Goodwill for the other person. :) She actually gave me the cup that matches this for Christmas last year (I think it was).
Now, just because I like to laugh, and I think those of you reading my blog probably do too, I must share this picture progression of the cake time.
Picture
So, here I am, looking like a good girl with my new gun and my (as I was to soon find out) very delicious chocolate cake with rum citrus glaze.
Picture
What happens when I don't get the candle blown out on the first try...
Picture
I got it the second time around and got goofy...which inspired Mom to order the relighting of the candle...which of course, brought on more silliness...
Picture
"I'm gonna shot that flame out!"
Picture
And yes, I know it's blurry....but here's the result. :D (That is my five-year-old face...)
So, yes...it was a good day! I felt really, really good (Lyme-wise), I had energy...I got all sorts of lovely birthday greetings from friends (some of whom I know in person, some of whom I have yet the joy of meeting face to face)...birthdays, even simple ones which are not overly different from "ordinary" days, are beautiful. Not only has God seen fit to bring me through another year and open forth a new one to me, but I felt very loved from both my family and friends. So thank-you all for the very lovely day. :) 

Keep laughing, y'all!

      Racheal

1 Comment

Saturday Night Dance

10/8/2014

0 Comments

 
I finally got the pictures off the camera from last Saturday's as-we-were-running-out-the-door photo shoot. Anyway, to start at the beginning...

Two weeks ago at WWII Remembered we were given some information about a dance in a town roughly an hour and half distant from us. Well, Savannah followed up and it was decided, the three of us girls would be going to a dance Saturday evening!

Well and good. Then the usual disaster struck. 

I thought I knew what I was going to wear. Then I didn't. Thankfully, I didn't go into one of those "I hate clothes!" rants that have been far too frequent in my past. Mama loaded her middle kid into the car and drove to the Goodwill. It was the 50% off EVERYTHING day and EVERYONE and their neighbor was there. However, we found a dress. Amazing, right? (Providence again, you see.)

It required a shirt under it for modesty sake, but I think it turned out just fine...even though it was a wee bit long. (I only stepped on it twice though, so it wasn't bad at all.)
Picture
I borrowed the earrings from Katherine, but they fell off during the third or so dance, so I stuffed them in my gloves until a convenient time to put them someplace safer.
Picture
Many thanks to my great-aunt for her lovely gift of the "fur" wrap a year back. I have had opportunity to wear it a couple of times.
Picture
Katherine actually has a velvet cape! Where'd she get it? I don't know--probably Goodwill or the Salvation Army. :)
Anyway, I forget the reason we were scrambling to get out the door to begin with, but what with the picture taking spree, we got out later than we wanted too...
Picture
Well, I was in the navigator's chair. We have been through the town we were headed to (and eaten lunch in a parking lot at least once) and I was sure I knew how to get us there, so I didn't print off the map...and only did a rather sketchy job of the written directions. Anyway, I guess I missed a step...and then we missed a turn because the intersection didn't look right to me (I realized later it was simply because it was from a different angle). 

Savannah wanted to go a different way than I had us planned...so when we messed up my route, we decided to try her's...and that didn't work. As I put it to Mr. R (the gentleman who informed us of the dance to begin with), "We took my route in the end--with a detour." 

We thought we were going to be late. I was in a state of angst which was quickly relieved when we arrived and we really weren't late. 

And we danced. During the pre-supper set, we were all asked to dance by the young men. Afterwards, not so much. I started switching off sisters to ensure they got danced with (and I got to dance). As usual when I do that, I landed myself in then gent's line. One of them remarked at some point that that threw him off a little. (My words, his gist.) It just made me laugh.

Despite the decline in gentlemen's attention, we all had a lovely time and look forward to the next time...whenever that is. :) While it is pleasant to dance with a gent, I love to dance so much that I enjoy it even when I pair up with another lady. :)

We headed home as other folks were doing so and ended up going home differently yet! We got "lost" but thanks to maps and cellphones that one can use like a flash-light, we got home!

I was downright exhausted...
Picture
Kicked my shoes off and left them just like that.
And just for kicks and giggles...
Picture

     Racheal

0 Comments

The Church of Christ, Part 2

10/5/2014

0 Comments

 
It appears to me that I left off still in the section discussing the Presbyterian governmental system et al. Anyway, to continue, we will look at the Presbyterian government of the apostolic church as shown in Romans 15 and 16.
In the New Testament history of the apostolic church we see three kinds of presbyteries: congregational presbyteries, or sessions of local churches;
regional presbyteries, which are referred today simply as presbyteries; and synodical presbyteries, or general assemblies....These three types of presbyteries in the Christian church were modeled after the Jewish system of church government with its three ecclesiastical courts: the Sanhedrin, corresponding to the synodical
presbytery; the Presbytery, corresponding to the regional presbytery; and the Synogogue, with its rulers, corresponding to the session in the local congregation. (359)

First, in the New Testament we see elders given the authority by Christ (through calling, election and ordination), to govern the congregation (local church) of which they are members....Each local church had a plurality of elders, and when the elders were officially in session, together they ruled and managed the local church. (359)

Second, in the apostolic church we see broader presbyteries representing
several churches regionally, which we know today simply as presbyteries, to distinguish them from sessions. The New Testament speaks of a plurality of elders associated and assembled together as a presbytery, governing the congregations which they represented. (350-360)

"There is in the Word of Christ a pattern of one presbyterial government in common over several single congregations in one church." 80. Hall, The Divine Right of Church-Government, 217.  (361)

Third, in the apostolic church in the New Testament, we see the existence of synodical presbyteries, or what we call today general assemblies (Heb. 12:22f) or synods....This would mean that as the session has oversight of the local region, and the presbytery over a specific region, synod would have oversight over all the church in all regions of a larger region. Furthermore, it would mean that as church
members have the right to appeal a session’s decision to a presbytery, so they have the right to appeal a presbytery’s decision to a synod or general assembly. (362-363)

Now, what is the Biblical basis for believing that the apostolic church had synodical presbyteries? ...
First, the Old Testament presents us with a church court in Israel superior to her other courts (Ex. 18:22–26; Deut. 17:8, 12 compared with 2 Chron. 19:8, 11; Ps. 122:4–5). If the ecclesiastical government of the church of Israel in the Old Testament had “synagogues in every City which were subordinate to the Supreme Ecclesiastical Court at Jerusalem, then there ought to be a subordination of particular Churches among us to higher assemblies.” 88
Second, Jesus’ words in Matthew 18:15–21 infer such synodical presbyteries as church courts of appeal.
Third, the unity and catholicity of the visible church is the theological foundation for church government by synodical presbyteries. Christ has one visible catholic church. He has given this church His form of government for her in the Bible. The ordinances Christ has instituted belong to the entire visible church for her edification, and not just to single congregations.
Fourth, the apostolic church provides us with a model for synodical presbyteries in the New Testament, i.e., Acts 15 and 16. The regional presbyterial church at Antioch, and probably the churches of Syria and Cilicia as well (vs. 23, 41) sent representatives to a broader synodical presbyterial church at Jerusalem to settle an issue that was troubling the less broad region of Antioch, Syria and Cilicia.
88. Hall, The Divine Right of Church-Government, 239. (363-365)

The power of presbyteries is limited by the lordship of Christ and the Word of God. It is the spiritual power of the keys of the kingdom, not the political power of the sword. It is neither absolute nor infallible, but limited and fallible. All of its decrees and decisions are to be in total agreement with the Word of God. And if the decision of any presbytery is not consonant with that Word, a member or a presbytery has the right of appeal, from the local session to the regional presbytery to the synodical presbytery or general assembly. Furthermore, the power of presbytery is not only persuasive, it is also juridical. In other words, the presbytery is not only able to give solemn advice and counsel with forceful moral persuasions, but every one within its bounds is “obliged reverently to esteem, and dutifully to submit unto so far as agreeable to the Word of Christ.”95 Hall, The Divine Right of Church-Government, 224. (366)
There are six lessons to be learned from the situation in Acts 15 and 16 namely,
[1] The Standard of Christian Authority
The presbytery at Jerusalem settled the dispute in Antioch by the exposition
and application of the Word of God (15:16), as the only way of understanding
God’s providence and of refuting false teachers. This teaches us that the only standard by which the affairs of the church are to be regulated is the revealed will of God. (368)

[2] The Authority of Church Officers 
"The inspired record of this Council of Jerusalem plainly sanctions the Presbyterian principle of the right of the office bearers of the church, as distinguished from the ordinary members, to decide judicially any disputes that may arise about the affairs of the church,—to be the ordinary interpreters and administrators of Christ’s laws for the government of His house." 98 Cunningham, Historical Theology, 1:50. (368)

[3] The Place of Church Members
"Now, the way in which they are here introduced, plainly implies that they did not stand upon the same platform in the matter with the apostles and elders… It does imply, however, that after the apostles and elders had made up their minds as
to what was the mind and will of God in this matter, and what decision should be pronounced, the subject was brought before the people,—that they were called upon to attend to it, to exercise their judgment upon it, and to make up their mind regarding it." 102. Cunningham, Historical Theology, 1:55–56 (371)

[4] The Subordination of Church Courts
"The whole transaction here recorded… naturally and obviously wears the aspect of the church at Antioch referring an important and difficult question, because of its importance and difficulty, and because of its affecting the interests of the whole church, to the church of Jerusalem, as to a superior authority; and of that church accordingly entertaining the reference, and giving an authoritative decision upon the subject referred to them." 103. Cunningham, Historical Theology, 1:59–60. (372)

[5] The Obligation of Apostolic Practice
It was a deliberative assembly, proceeding by discourses and disputes, not by apostolic Spirit-produced words. In Acts 15, we see the ordinary procedures of presbytery: debate, dispute, exposition and application of the Bible, and voting.
Why would all this be needed if the apostles present were acting in a miraculous and extraordinary manner? (379)

[6] The Divine Right of Presbyterian Government
Christ is the head over His church. This is shown in the following points: 1) Christ is the head over all things for the Church (Eph. 1:20-23); 2) Christ is the Covenantal head of His Church (Rom. 5:12f); 3) Christ is the organic head of His Church (Eph. 4:15-16; 5:23, 28-30); and 4) Christ is the organizational head of His Church (Eph. 5:23-24). [see pages 380-384 for further discussion]

Who are the officers of the Church and what are their roles?

First, Christ is Head and King:
The first office in the church is the office of Head and King of the
church, which is the Lord Jesus Christ....“Christ is the real King and Head of the Church, as a visible organisation, ruling it by His statutes, and ordinances, and officers, and forces, as truly and literally as David or Solomon ruled the covenant people of old.”119 Walker, quoted in Berkhof, Systematic Theology, 582. (385)

Christ’s kingly authority is manifested in His church in a variety of ways. (1) He instituted the church...(2) He instituted the means of grace which His church must administer: the Word of God and the sacraments of baptism and the Lord’s Supper ...(3) He gave to His church its constitution and officers, and bestowed on them authority to rule the church in His name...(4) He is always present with His church when it meets for worship, acting and speaking through its officers... (386)
Second, the offices of Apostle and Prophet in the New Testament:
The second and third offices in the church were those of the apostles and prophets in the New Testament. The apostles and prophets, as vehicles of verbal and inerrant revelation from God, constitute the foundation of the church with Christ as the “cornerstone,” i.e., the principal support and cause of growth: “So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are fellow-citizens with the saints, and are of God’s household, having been built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus Himself being the cornerstone” (Eph. 2:19–20). The Spirit-revealed, written teachings of the Christ-commissioned apostles and prophets are
the doctrinal and organizational foundation of the Christian church through the ages to the very end of the world. (386)

Neither the office of apostle nor the office of prophet were meant to be perpetual offices in the church. They were extraordinary and temporary offices inseparably connected to the laying of the foundation of the Christian church in the first century (Eph. 2:19, 20). (387)
Third (or fourth, if counting identically to Dr. Morecraft) is the office of Minister of Word and Sacraments:
The office of the minister of the Word is a permanent office in the church. We know this to be the case for four reasons. (1) Christ commissioned His church to disciple, baptize and instruct all nations to the end of the world by the preaching and teaching of the Word of God (Matt. 28:18–20). (2) The Spirit-inspired and Christ commissioned apostles made provision in the New Testament for this history-long mission with the institution of the office of minister to succeed the apostles after they passed off the scene....(3) Ephesians 4:11–13 tells us that the ministerial
office will be needed “until we all attain unto the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a full grown man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ.” (4) The permanency of the office of minister is assumed in the words of Jesus in Luke 12:42–43: “And the Lord said, ‘Who then is the faithful and sensible steward, whom his master will put in charge of his servants, to give them their rations at the proper time? Blessed is that slave whom his master finds so doing when he comes.’” (388)
Here Dr. Morecraft takes a detour into the meaning of "preaches" and "preaching", but I will only barely touch on it. The text he mainly works from is Romans 10:1-21.
As contemporary French Calvinist, Pierre Marcel has written: “the power of the preached Word is the very power of God… for it accomplishes the works which the Godhead alone is able to perform in the hearts of lost men; its effectiveness is divine.” 126 Pierre Marcel, The Relevance of Preaching, trans. by Rob Roy McGregor (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1963), 14. (393)

The point Paul is making is that the preaching of Christ is to be heard in the preaching of heralds of the gospel, and that it is heard with such power that it raises the spiritual dead to new life and subdues the rebel’s heart to faith and submission to Him. (394)

Not every Christian is called to “herald the gospel,” although all Christians are to evangelize. ...
So then, to be “sent” is to be commissioned by Christ to serve, represent and speak for Him officially in His own authority, as an ambassador and herald. (395)

Only ordained officers in the church specifically “sent” by Christ to “herald” the gospel are authorized by Him to proclaim His gospel. The point is that not all Christians are to be “preachers.” In fact, a person should think long and hard before he aspires to this teaching office. As James 3:1 warns us: “Let not many of you become teachers, my brethren, knowing that as such we shall incur a stricter judgment.” (398)

There are two parts to the call into the ministry of preaching: an internal call of the Holy Spirit and an outward call of the Church, both of which originate with Christ Himself. Furthermore, there are two parts of the internal call of the Spirit of Christ to the office of preaching: desire and fitness. (416)

[1] The inward call:
Wilhelmus á Brakel writes that this inner desire for the work of preaching grows out of "an extraordinary love (a) for Christ and a desire to make Him known; (b) for the church to present her as a chaste virgin to Christ (2 Cor. 11:2) and to cause her to shine forth with light and holiness to the honor of God; (c) for the souls of the unconverted to snatch them from the fire, as well as of the converted to strengthen, comfort, and continually provide them with spiritual food." 141 Wilhelmus á Brakel, The Christian’s Reasonable Service, 4 vols (Morgan, PA: Soli Deo Gloria Publications, 1992), 2:122. (417)

The general attitudes flowing from the obedience to Christ that must be present in anyone called to preach are:
"1. Self-discipline, not just in academics, but in all of life, from prayer and Bible study to proper habits of rest and exercise.
2. Self-sacrifice, a genuine willingness to endure hardship in terms of finances, peer esteem, physical comfort if the cause of Christ demands it.
3. Self-giving, not only to the powerful and wealthy, but also to the weak, the poor, to any who are in need in any way.
4. Self-control, a sense of the Spirit’s sanctifying work in one’s own life, an awareness that Christ alone is one’s Master." 147. Nederhood, “The Minister’s Call,” 55–6. (419-420)

[2] The outward call:
Those who are called of God must cheerfully submit themselves to the examination, approval and ordination of the church. Christ sends men to preach through the
“sending” of the church (Acts 13:2; 15:26). A person’s sense of an inward call must be checked and confirmed by the elders of the church, lest he be guilty of appointing himself to the office of preaching, and therefore preach “unsent.” (420)
Next is the office of Ruling Elder:
In every organized church there should be three classes of officers: (1) At least one minister of the Word, or preaching elder, (2) At least two ruling elders, and (3) Deacons. The office of ruling elder is of vital and necessary importance in the church, because “the laws which Christ has appointed for the government and edification of his people cannot possibly be executed without such a class of officers.” 152. Miller, The Ruling Elder, 172. (422)

Ruling elders are absolutely necessary for a healthy and useful church....Neither the purity nor the beauty nor the orderliness of the churches of Christ, nor the credible witness to the world of the majesty and authority of Christ, can be maintained for long without ruling elders in each church, faithfully carrying out the shepherding duties Christ has assigned them. (423)

The office of elder goes all the way back to the days of Moses, some 3500 years
ago. The New Testament office of elder is a continuation and clarification of the Old Testament office of elder. He was a man of maturity and experience deserving honor...OT elders were the representative heads of families, who had the wisdom, discernment and experience to rule in the life of the covenant community, socially, judicially and morally. (423)

Why are elders so vitally important to the health and usefulness of the church?...Because ruling elders are to be the guardians, managers, shepherds
and servants of the church which Christ purchased with His own blood...They serve the church as Christ serves the church as her Guardian, Governor and Good Shepherd. (424)

The two chief services rendered to the church by the ruling elder are INSTRUCTION and GOVERNMENT. (425)

In 1846, the General Assembly of the Free Church of Scotland adopted this excellent summary of the duties of elders:
"1. That they sit in session along with the minister, and assist in the administration of discipline and in the spiritual government of the church.
2. That they take a careful oversight of the people’s morals and religious principles, of the attendance upon public ordinances, and of the state of personal and family religion.
3. That they visit the sick from time to time in their several districts.
4. That they superintend the religious instruction of the young, and assist the minister in ascertaining the qualifications of applicants for admission to sealing ordinances.
5. That they superintend and promote the formation of meetings within their districts for prayer, reading of the Scriptures, and Christian fellowship among the members of the church." 159 David Dickson, The Elder and His Work (Dallas, TX: Presbyterian Heritage
Publications, 1990), 10. (426-427)

Elders are to be elected by the congregation in which they will serve, and ordained by the session of that church with the laying on of hands. They are elected for life and not for a limited term. This election to the office of elder “continues through life, unless the individual be deposed from office. Like a minister of the gospel, he cannot
lay aside his office at pleasure.” 162 . Miller, The Ruling Elder, 270. (427)
There are both "positive" (that which he should be/have) and "negative" (that which he should not be/have) requirements for the office of elder:
The Positive (pages 430-432):
Above Reproach
Marital Fidelity
Ordered-Believing Household
Hospitable
Lover of Good
Sensible and Sober-Minded
Just
Devout
Self-Controlled
God-Gifted Teacher

The Negative (pages 432-433)
Self-Willed
Quick-Tempered
Addicted to Wine
Pugnacious
Fond of Sordid Gain
A New Convert
How should we respond to our elders?
...Jesus would have us obey, submit, appreciate, and esteem very highly in love those whom He makes ruling elders by His Spirit. We are to give to them loving submission as they work diligently overseeing us (“have charge over you”) and instructing/counseling us (“instruction”). We are to submit to their faithful, personal shepherding oversight of ourselves and our families in the church;
and to their faithful instruction in and preaching of the Word of God. (434)

When they must painfully exercise church discipline, we must not be offended with them for the faithful performance of duty. Rather, we must make the words of the psalmist our own: “Let the righteous smite me in kindness and reprove me; it is oil upon the head; do not let my head refuse it” (Ps. 141:5). (435)
There is a brief argument against "term eldership":
The office of ruling elder is a permanent office in the church....Moreover, “term eldership” is contrary to the implications of election and ordination to office.
However, elders may be removed from office for a variety of reasons. He may be removed for false doctrine, ungodliness, the absence of those gifts necessary for him to function as an elder, inability to exercise the functions of an elder—either because of age, infirmity or change of location....But, an elder may not simply leave office by a letter of resignation, unless that request is approved by the Session. (438) 

First, the fact that the elder was considered qualified for the office because of the gifts of the Spirit qualifying him for office argues against “term eldership. (438)

Second, election of a man to the office of elder by the congregation and his ordination by the Session also argue against “term eldership.” The congregation elects him and the Session ordains him because they are convinced he is qualified by the Holy Spirit to hold the office of elder. Through this process, Christ the Head of the church, and the Holy Spirit who indwells the church, are calling this particular man to the office of elder. (439)

Third, if the teaching elders and the ruling elders have parity in the exercise of church authority, then “term eldership” seems out of the question. The teaching elder is ordained to that office for life....It is inconsistent with the idea of parity for ruling elders not to be elected and ordained on an equally permanent basis. (440)
We will return to this study, Lord willing, next week, taking up the office of Deacon.

     Racheal

0 Comments

1940's Fashion Go to the Dolls...

10/3/2014

0 Comments

 
This particular post has been in the works for weeks...so I may end up re-writing it almost entirely so it flows better. :) Cheers and all that....
Picture


















Anyway, I spent a good part of the last month on a doll dress making spree. But it wasn't just any ol' doll dresses...it was 1940's style doll outfits. T

The first ones were rather "generic" (rather like the one above, affectionately called "The Dorthy Dress"); meaning I just used the pre-existing patterns and my memory.

Picture
Anyway, I went completely nuts as "my corner" showed (and still does to an extent...I need to put the patterns up).
Not only did I have the pieces from half a-dozen different patterns all mixed up in a massive pile...I *gasp* drafted some of my own patterns!!!

Well, nothing fancy mind you, but still--it's a start. Here's a quick run down on a skirt that I designed. 

There wasn't anything in "the stack" that suited me, so I grabbed Magnolia and started working.
Picture
Necessary ingredients--that includes the laptop; my inspiration was on it!
Picture
Fitting (sorta). {My hand looks so...fat.}
Picture
The result...
Picture
The complete pattern. (See below for the finished garment....it's down there someplace!)
That was just the start. I dove head-first into trying to re-create (doll-sized) original garments/patterns that I scoured from the internet. I used everything from photographs, pattern covers, and catalogs/ads for inspiration. I thought you might enjoy seeing the originals and then my doll-sized attempt at reproduction.


"The Dress with a Tie"
Picture
Dress in Question: Bottom Right-hand Corner
Picture
I did not put pockets on it...and obviously, only two buttons instead of three...
Picture
Picture
Um...there is a waist tie on there, you just can't see it too well.
Picture
The Second of this pattern I made. I like this one better.
This next one didn't get a nickname. I made a couple of these (more or less). As I was doing the hand work on one of them, I realized that I had stitched the skirt on inside out, so that one still isn't quite finished.
Picture
Picture
Picture
This is the skirt pattern I showed you up top. I didn't actually manage the little point on the waistband...but the rest of it worked up well.
Picture
I tried making the one of the left...with a non-button front peasant blouse.
Picture
Poor Magnolia lacks much waist definition...
Picture
Picture
I thought I had a third one of those, but I couldn't find the picture, so maybe not...

This next dress required cutting out a different bodice front, which wasn't hard, and then having a moment of free-hand inspiration to get the right look for the skirt (because there was no way I was going to stitch a bunch of tiny gores together for this; particularly doing French seams).
Picture
Picture
The doll dress skirt has darts rather than gores, but the look is pretty much the same. There is gathering along the shoulders as well, but this pictures doesn't show it well.
Picture
This next one is an actual doll dress pattern that I attempted to copy.
Picture
Picture
I have made a couple of these...but this was the first one that I remembered to cut a scooped neckline on.
Picture
This particular pattern is awfully snug on the dolls. Hopefully, I will remember to cut it a wee bit bigger on the next one!
I love this one...particularly with the inventive (pat myself on the back, will I?) touch I put on it.
Picture
Picture
The skirt/suspenders are actually made entirely out of the sleeve of a man's shirt.
Picture
See? I just used the underarm seam as the back seam. This outfit closes on the side.
Sailor collar!! (Hum "Anchor's Aweigh!")
Picture
Picture
All told, I am pretty doggone pleased with that one.

As well as this next one...I just didn't run the ruffles all the way down.
Picture
Picture
Those two really are one of a kinds...and some of my personal favorites.

I kept coming back to this picture...particularly that dress in the middle...
Picture
And this is what I ended up with:
Picture
A little shorter than it was supposed to be (I guess I forgot to un-fold the pattern piece to length it) and no waist belt--though I did actually make one of the checkered material. I found a little hole in it so just scrapped it.

I also created my own suit pattern...I made six or seven of them. but I'll only bore you with this one. If you want to see the rest of them, hop over to Lady Libby's. :)
Picture
Well...that's a smattering of the many, many dresses I made. :)

      Racheal

0 Comments
<<Previous
    New post on The Bee Project! 04/26/18
    Picture

    The Middle Kid

    I chose to title this blog "The Adventures of a Middle Kid" because that is exactly what I'll be detailing (mostly). I chose 'kid' over any other word, like 'girl' (I am the middle girl so it also would have worked) or 'child'
    (since I am no longer exactly a child).

    I am a middle kid and I will always be a middle kid--even when I'm 80!

    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013

    Follow
    Picture
    The anti-Christ will not overrun Christ’s church or kingdom.
    Christ will win. He is winning. He has won. --Joe Morecraft, III
    Picture

    Categories

    All
    1942 Truck Restoration
    Accidents
    Agriculture
    Authentic Christianity
    Books
    Caretaking
    Cats
    Cattle
    Chickens
    Church
    Confederates
    Conference
    Cooking
    Costumes
    Cow Cavalry
    Family
    Farmers Market
    Filmmaking
    Food
    Friends
    History
    Holidays
    Horse
    Knitting
    Lyme/Co Infections
    Lyme/Co-Infections
    Mechanics
    Movies
    Music
    Musings
    Musket Echos
    Nonesense
    Pictures
    Politics
    Reenacting
    Rodeo
    Sewing
    Shooting
    Theology/Philosophy
    Video
    War Between The States
    Weather
    Weddings
    Work
    Writing
    WWII

    Picture

    Picture
    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Picture
    Picture
    FREEDOM'S LIGHT FILMS
    Picture
    Picture
    Reformed Reviews
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    www.fold3.com
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    7 Lb.s of Bacon Mess Band
    Picture
    Picture
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.